Pharmacotherapeutic group: SGLT2 Inhibitor.
ATC code: A10BK03.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of action: Empagliflozin is a reversible competitive inhibitor of SGLT2 with an IC
50 of 1.3 nM. It has a 5000-fold selectivity over human SGLT1 (IC
50 of 6278 nM), responsible for glucose absorption in the gut.
SGLT2 is highly expressed in the kidney, whereas expression in other tissues is absent or very low. It is responsible as the predominant transporter for re-absorption of glucose from the glomerular filtrate back into the circulation. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hyperglycaemia a higher amount of glucose is filtered and reabsorbed.
Empagliflozin improves glycaemic control in patients with T2DM by reducing renal glucose re-absorption. The amount of glucose removed by the kidney through this glucuretic mechanism is dependent upon the blood glucose concentration and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Through inhibition of SGLT2 in patients with T2DM and hyperglycaemia, excess glucose is excreted in the urine.
In patients with T2DM, urinary glucose excretion increased immediately following the first dose of empagliflozin and is continuous over the 24 hour dosing interval. Increased urinary glucose excretion was maintained at the end of 4-week treatment period, averaging approximately 78 g/day with empagliflozin 25 mg once daily. Increased urinary glucose excretion resulted in an immediate reduction in plasma glucose levels in patients with T2DM.
Empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) improves both fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose levels.
There is no direct effect on changes in β cell function and insulin secretion / action, and this contributes to a low risk of hypoglycaemia. Improvement of surrogate markers of beta cell function including Homeostasis Model Assessment-β (HOMA-β) and proinsulin to insulin ratio were noted. In addition urinary glucose excretion triggers calorie loss, associated with body fat loss and body weight reduction.
The glucosuria observed with empagliflozin is accompanied by mild diuresis which may contribute to sustained and moderate reduction of blood pressure (BP).
Empagliflozin also reduces sodium reabsorption and increases the delivery of sodium to the distal tubule. This may influence several physiological functions including, but not restricted to, increasing tubuloglomerular feedback and reducing intraglomerular pressure, lowering both pre- and afterload of the heart, and downregulating of sympathetic activity and reducing left ventricular wall stress as evidenced by lower NT-proBNP values and beneficial effects on cardiac remodeling, filling pressures and diastolic function.
Clinical Trials: Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A total of 17,331 patients with T2DM were evaluated in 15 double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled clinical studies, of which 4603 patients received empagliflozin 10 mg and 5567 received empagliflozin 25 mg. Six studies had a treatment duration of 24 weeks; in extensions of applicable studies, and other trials, patients were exposed to JARDIANCE for up to 102 weeks.
Treatment with empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, pioglitazone, sulfonylurea, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and insulin lead to clinically relevant improvements in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP, respectively). Administration of empagliflozin 25 mg resulted in a higher proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c goal of ≤7% and fewer patients needing glycaemic rescue compared to empagliflozin 10 mg and placebo. There was a clinically meaningful improvement in HbA1c in all subgroups of gender, race, geographic region, time since diagnosis of T2DM, BMI, insulin resistance based on HOMA-IR, and beta cell function based on HOMA-β. Higher baseline HbA1c was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c. Clinically meaningful HbA1c reduction was seen in patients with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73m
2 (see Patients with renal impairment under Dosage & Administration). In patients aged 75 years and older, reduced efficacy of JARDIANCE was observed.
Empagliflozin as monotherapy: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) as monotherapy was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study of 24 weeks duration in treatment-naïve patients. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline in body weight and blood pressure (systolic, SBP and diastolic, DBP) after 24 weeks of treatment.
Treatment with JARDIANCE resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA1c, body weight and SBP compared to placebo (Table 1) and a clinically meaningful decrease in FPG. A numerical decrease in DBP was seen but did not reach statistical significance versus placebo (-1.0 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.9 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg, -0.5 mmHg for placebo, and +0.7 mmHg for sitagliptin).
In a prespecified analysis of patients (n=201) with a baseline HbA1c ≥8.5% to ≤10% empagliflozin resulted in a reduction in HbA1c from baseline of -1.44% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.43% for empagliflozin 25 mg, +0.01% for placebo, and -1.04% for sitagliptin.
In the double-blind placebo-controlled extension of this study, reductions of HbA1c (change from baseline of -0.65% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.76% for empagliflozin 25 mg, +0.13% for placebo, and -0.53% for sitagliptin), body weight (change from baseline of -2.24 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.45 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg, -0.43 kg for placebo, and +0.10 kg for sitagliptin) and BP (SBP: change from baseline of -4.1 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -4.2 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg, -0.7 mmHg for placebo, and -0.3 mmHg for sitagliptin, DBP: change from baseline of -1.6 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.6 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg, -0.6 mmHg for placebo, and -0.1 mmHg for sitagliptin) were sustained up to 76 weeks of treatment.
Treatment with JARDIANCE daily significantly improved marker of beta cell function, including HOMA-β. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin as add on to metformin therapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 24 weeks duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with T2DM not controlled on metformin. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline in body weight and mean daily plasma glucose (MDG) after 24 weeks of treatment.
Treatment with JARDIANCE resulted in statistically significant improvements in HbA1c and body weight, and clinically meaningful reductions in FPG and BP compared to placebo (Table 2).
In the double-blind placebo-controlled extension of this study, reductions of HbA1c (change from baseline of -0.62% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.74% for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.01% for placebo), body weight (change from baseline of -2.39 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.65 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.46 kg for placebo) and BP (SBP: change from baseline of -5.2 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -4.5 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.8 mmHg for placebo, DBP: change from baseline of -2.5 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.9 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.5 mmHg for placebo) were sustained up to 76 weeks of treatment. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin and metformin combination therapy in drug-naïve patients: A factorial design study of 24 weeks duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in drug-naïve patients. The majority of patients had been diagnosed with diabetes for up to a year (55.8%) or for between one and five years (28.6%). Their mean age was 52.6 years and mean BMI was 30.37 kg/m
2. Treatment with empagliflozin in combination with metformin (5 mg and 500 mg; 5 mg and 1000 mg; 12.5 mg and 500 mg, and 12.5 mg and 1000 mg given twice daily) provided statistically significant improvements in HbA1c and led to significantly greater reductions in FPG and body weight compared to the individual components. A greater proportion of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% and treated with empagliflozin in combination with metformin achieved a target HbA1c <7% compared to the individual components (Tables 3 and 4). (See Tables 3 and 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin as add on to a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea therapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 24 weeks duration was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients not sufficiently treated with a combination of metformin and a sulfonylurea. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline in body weight and mean daily plasma glucose (MDG) after 24 weeks of treatment.
Treatment with JARDIANCE resulted in statistically significant improvements in HbA1c and body weight and clinically meaningful reductions in FPG and BP compared to placebo (Table 5).
In the double-blind placebo-controlled extension of this study, reductions of HbA1c (change from baseline of -0.74% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.72% for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.03% for placebo), body weight (change from baseline of -2.44 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.28 kg for empagliflozin and -0.63 kg for placebo) and BP (SBP: change from baseline of -3.8 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -3.7 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -1.6 mmHg for placebo, DBP: change from baseline of -2.6 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.3 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -1.4 mmHg for placebo) were sustained up to 76 weeks of treatment. (See Table 5.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
2 hour post-prandial glucose: Treatment with empagliflozin as add-on to metformin or metformin plus sulfonylurea resulted in clinically meaningful improvement of 2-hour post-prandial glucose (meal tolerance test) at 24 weeks (add-on to metformin: -2.55 mmol/L for empagliflozin 10 mg (n=52), -2.47 mmol/L for empagliflozin 25 mg (n=58) and +0.33 mmol/L for placebo (n=57); add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea: -1.98 mmol/L for empagliflozin 10 mg (n=44), -2.03 mmol/L for empagliflozin 25 mg (n=46) and -0.13 mmol/L for placebo (n=35)).
Empagliflozin as add on to a combination of pioglitazone therapy (+/- metformin): The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 24 weeks duration in patients with T2DM not controlled on a combination of metformin and pioglitazone or pioglitazone alone. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline in FPG and body weight after 24 weeks of treatment.
Empagliflozin in combination with pioglitazone (dose ≥30 mg) with or without metformin resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA1c, FPG, and body weight and clinically meaningful reductions in BP compared to placebo (Table 6).
In the double-blind placebo-controlled extension of this study, reductions of HbA1c (change from baseline of -0.61% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.70% for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.01% for placebo), body weight (change from baseline of -1.47 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.21 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg and +0.50 kg for placebo) and BP (SBP: change from baseline of -1.7 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -3.4 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and +0.3 mmHg for placebo, DBP: change from baseline of -1.3 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.0 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and +0.2 mmHg for placebo) were sustained up to 76 weeks of treatment. (See Table 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin 2-year data, as add on to metformin in comparison to glimepiride: In a study comparing the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin 25 mg versus glimepiride (4 mg) in patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone, treatment with empagliflozin daily resulted in superior reduction in HbA1c, and a clinically meaningful reduction in FPG, compared to glimepiride (Table 7). Empagliflozin daily resulted in a statistically significant reduction in body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Treatment with empagliflozin resulted in statistically significantly lower proportion of patients with hypoglycaemic events compared to glimepiride (2.5% for empagliflozin, 24.2% for glimepiride, p<0.0001). (See Table 7.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin as add on to basal insulin therapy: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) as add on to basal insulin with or without concomitant metformin and/or sulfonylurea therapy was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 78 weeks duration. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 18 weeks of treatment. The key secondary endpoints were the change from baseline in dose of basal insulin dose after 78 weeks of treatment and change from baseline in HbA1c after 78 weeks of treatment.
During the initial 18 weeks the insulin dose was to be kept stable, but was adjusted to achieve a FPG <6.10 mmol/L in the following 60 weeks.
At week 18, empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) provided statistically significant improvement in HbA1c compared to placebo. A greater proportion of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% achieved a target HbA1c of <7% compared to placebo. At 78 weeks, empagliflozin resulted in a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c and insulin sparing compared to placebo (Table 8).
At week 78, empagliflozin resulted in a reduction in FPG (-0.58 mmol/L for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.97 mmol/L for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.30 mmol/L for placebo), body weight (-2.47 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.96 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg and +1.16 kg for placebo, p<0.0001), BP (SBP: -4.1 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.4 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and +0.1 mmHg for placebo, DBP: -2.9 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -1.5 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.3 mmHg for placebo). (See Table 8.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin as add on to multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin therapy and metformin: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add-on to multiple daily insulin with or without concomitant metformin therapy (71.0% of all patients were on metformin background) was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 52 weeks duration. During the initial 18 weeks and the last 12 weeks, the insulin dose was to be kept stable, but was adjusted to achieve pre-prandial glucose levels <5.5 mmol/L, and post-prandial glucose levels <7.8 mmol/L between Weeks 19 and 40.
At Week 18, empagliflozin provided statistically significant improvement in HbA1c compared with placebo (Table 9). A greater proportion of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% (19.5% empagliflozin 10 mg, 31.0% empagliflozin 25 mg) achieved a target HbA1c of <7% compared with placebo (15.1%).
At Week 52, treatment with empagliflozin resulted in a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c and insulin sparing compared with placebo and a reduction in FPG (change from baseline of -0.02 mmol/L for placebo, -1.09 mmol/L for empagliflozin 10 mg, and -1.31 mmol/L for empagliflozin 25 mg), body weight, and blood pressure (SBP: change from baseline of -2.6 mmHg for placebo, -3.9 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -4.0 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg, DBP: change from baseline of -1.0 mmHg for placebo, -1.4 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -2.6 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg). (See Table 9.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin as add on to DPP-4 inhibitor therapy: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add on to DPP-4 inhibitors plus metformin, with or without one additional oral anti-diabetic drug was evaluated in 160 patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk. Treatment with empagliflozin for 28 weeks reduced Hb1Ac compared to placebo (change from baseline -0.54% for empagliflozin 10 mg, -0.52% for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.02% for placebo).
Empagliflozin vs. placebo in patients inadequately controlled on metformin and linagliptin: In patients inadequately controlled on metformin and linagliptin, 24-weeks treatment with both doses (10 mg and 25 mg) of empagliflozin provided statistically significant improvements in HbA1c, FPG and body weight compared to placebo (background linagliptin 5 mg). A statistically significantly greater number of patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥7.0% and treated with empagliflozin achieved a target HbA1c of <7% compared to placebo (background linagliptin 5 mg) (Table 10). After 24 weeks' treatment with empagliflozin, both SBPs and DBPs were reduced, -2.6/-1.1 mmHg (n.s. versus placebo for SBP and DBP) for empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg and -1.3/-0.1 mmHg (n.s. versus placebo for SBP and DBP) for empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg.
After 24 weeks, rescue therapy was used in 4 (3.6%) patients treated with empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg and in 2 (1.8%) patients treated with empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg, compared to 13 (12.0%) patients treated with placebo (background linagliptin 5 mg). (See Table 10.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In a prespecified subgroup of patients with baseline HbA1c greater or equal than 8.5% the reduction from baseline in HbA1c with empagliflozin 25 mg / linagliptin 5 mg was -1.3% at 24 weeks (p<0.0001 versus placebo [background linagliptin 5 mg]) and with empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg -1.3% at 24 weeks (p<0.0001 versus placebo [background linagliptin 5 mg]).
Patients with renal impairment, 52 weeks placebo controlled data: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add on to anti-diabetic therapy was evaluated in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study for 52 weeks.
Treatment with JARDIANCE led to statistically significant reduction of HbA1c and clinically meaningful improvement in FPG, body weight and BP compared to placebo at Week 24 (Table 11). The improvement in HbA1c, FPG, body weight, and BP was sustained up to 52 weeks. (See Table 11.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Patients with high baseline HbA1c >10%: In a pre-specified pooled analysis of three phase 3 studies, treatment with open-label empagliflozin 25 mg in patients with severe hyperglycaemia (n=184, mean baseline HbA1c 11.15%) resulted in a clinically meaningful reduction in HbA1c from baseline (-3.27%) at week 24.
Body weight: In a pre-specified pooled analysis of 4 placebo controlled studies, treatment with empagliflozin resulted in body weight reduction compared to placebo at week 24 (-2.04 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.26 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.24 kg for placebo) that was maintained up to week 52 (-1.96 kg for empagliflozin 10 mg, -2.25 kg for empagliflozin 25 mg and -0.16 kg for placebo).
Waist circumference: At 24 weeks, treatment with empagliflozin as monotherapy or as add-on to metformin, pioglitazone, or metformin plus sulfonylurea resulted in sustained reduction of waist circumference over the duration of studies in a range of -1.7 cm to -0.9 cm for empagliflozin and -0.5 cm to +0.2 cm for placebo.
Blood pressure: The efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (10 mg and 25 mg) was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 12 weeks duration in patients with T2DM and high BP on different oral anti-diabetic drugs and up to 2 antihypertensive agents (Table 12). Treatment with empagliflozin once daily resulted in statistically significant improvement in HbA1c and reduction in 24-hour mean SBP and DBP as determined by ambulatory BP monitoring. Treatment with empagliflozin also provided reductions in seated SBP (change from baseline of -0.67 mmHg for placebo, -4.60 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -5.47 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg) and seated DBP (change from baseline of -1.13 mmHg for placebo, -3.06 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -3.02 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg). (See Table 12.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In a pre-specified pooled analysis of 4 placebo-controlled studies, treatment with empagliflozin resulted in a reduction in SBP (-3.9 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -4.3 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg) compared with placebo (-0.5 mmHg), and in DBP (-1.8 mmHg for empagliflozin 10 mg and -2.0 mmHg for empagliflozin 25 mg) compared with placebo (-0.5 mmHg), at week 24, that were maintained up to week 52.
Cardiovascular outcome: The EMPA-REG OUTCOME study is a multi-centre, multi-national, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effect of JARDIANCE as adjunct to standard care therapy in reducing cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes and one or more CV risk factors, including coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, history of myocardial infarction (MI), or history of stroke. The primary endpoint was the time to first event in the composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or non-fatal stroke (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE-3)). Additional pre-specified endpoints addressing clinically relevant outcomes tested in an exploratory manner included CV death, the composite of heart failure requiring hospitalisation or CV death, all-cause mortality and the composite of new or worsening nephropathy.
A total of 7020 patients were treated with JARDIANCE (empagliflozin 10 mg: 2345, empagliflozin 25 mg: 2342, placebo: 2333) and followed for a median of 3.1 years.
The population was 72.4% Caucasian, 21.6% Asian, and 5.1% Black. The mean age was 63 years and 71.5% were male. At baseline, approximately 81% of patients were being treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 65% with beta-blockers, 43% with diuretics, 89% with anticoagulants, and 81% with lipid lowering medication. Approximately 74% of patients were being treated with metformin at baseline, 48% with insulin and 43% with sulfonylurea. The baseline HbA1c was <7% in 6.0% of the patients, 7 to <8% in 43.7% of the patients, 8 to <9% in 33.2% of the patients, and ≥9% in 17.0% of the patients. The time since diagnosis of diabetes was ≤5 years for 18.0% of the patients, >5 to 10 years for 24.9% of the patients, and >10 years for 57.1% of the patients.
About half of the patients (52.2%) had an eGFR of 60-90 mL/min/1.73m
2, 17.8% of 45-60 mL/min/1.73m
2 and 7.7% of 30-45 mL/min/1.73m
2. Mean systolic BP was 136 mmHg, diastolic BP 76 mmHg, low density lipoprotein (LDL) 2.2 mmol/L, and high density lipoprotein (HDL) 1.1 mmol/L. The urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was normal in 59.4% of the patients, 28.7% had microalbuminuria, and 11% had macroalbuminuria.
Reductions in risk of CV death and all-cause mortality: JARDIANCE was superior in reducing the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke compared to placebo. The incidence rate was 37.1 for JARDIANCE (10 and 25 mg, pooled) compared to 43.9 with placebo. The treatment effect reflected a significant reduction in cardiovascular death with no significant change in non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke (Table 13 and Figure 1).
JARDIANCE also improved all-cause mortality (Table 13), which was driven by a reduction in cardiovascular death with JARDIANCE. There was no statistically significant difference between empagliflozin and placebo in non-cardiovascular mortality. (See Table 13 and Figure 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Reductions in risk of heart failure requiring hospitalisation or CV death: JARDIANCE significantly reduced the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure compared with placebo (Table 14 and Figure 2). (See Table 14 and Figure 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The cardiovascular benefits (CV death and hospitalisation for heart failure or CV death) of JARDIANCE observed were consistent across major demographic and disease subgroups.
Diabetic kidney disease: In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME study population, the risk of new or worsening nephropathy (defined as onset of macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, and initiation of renal replacement therapy (i.e. haemodialysis)) was significantly reduced in empagliflozin group compared to placebo (Table 15 and Figure 3).
JARDIANCE compared with placebo showed a significantly higher occurrence of sustained normo- or microalbuminuria in patients with baseline macroalbuminuria (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.40, 2.37). (See Table 15 and Figure 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Treatment with empagliflozin preserved eGFR and eGFR increased during the post treatment 4-week follow up. However, the placebo group showed a gradual decline in GFR during the course of the study with no further change during 4-week follow up (see Figure 4).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Thorough QTc study: In a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, crossover study of 30 healthy subjects no increase in QTc was observed with either 25 mg or 200 mg empagliflozin.
Heart failure: Empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EMPEROR-Reduced) was conducted in 3730 patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] II-IV) and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40 %) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin 10 mg once daily as adjunct to standard of care heart failure therapy. The primary endpoint was the time to adjudicated first event of either cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Occurrence of adjudicated HHF (first and recurrent) and eGFR(CKD-EPI)
cr slope of change from baseline were included in the confirmatory testing. Heart Failure therapy at baseline included ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (88.3%), beta blockers (94.7%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (71.3%) and diuretics (95.0%).
A total of 1863 patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg (placebo: 1867) and followed for a median of 15.7 months. The study population consisted of 76.1% men and 23.9% women with a mean age of 66.8 years (range: 25-94 years), 26.8% were 75 years of age or older. 70.5% of the study population were White, 18.0% Asian and 6.9% Black/African American. At randomization, 75.1% of patients were NYHA class II, 24.4% were class III and 0.5% were class IV. The mean LVEF was 27.5%. At baseline, the mean eGFR was 62.0 ml/min/1.73 m
2 and the median urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 22 mg/g. About half of the patients (51.7%) had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2, 24.1% of 45 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m
2, 18.6% of 30 to <45 ml/min/1.73 m
2 and 5.3% 20 to <30 ml/min/1.73 m
2.
Empagliflozin was superior in reducing the risk of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure compared with placebo. Additionally, empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of occurrence of HHF (first and recurrent), and significantly reduced the rate of eGFR decline (Table 16; Figures 5 and 6). (See Table 16, Figures 5 and 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The results of the primary composite endpoint were generally consistent with a hazard ratio (HR) below 1 across the pre-specified subgroups, including patients with heart failure, with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus and with or without renal impairment (down to an eGFR of 20 ml/min/1.73 m
2).
During treatment, eGFR decline over time was slower in the empagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (Figure 3). Treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg significantly reduced the rate of eGFR decline (Table 11) and the effect was consistent across all pre-specified subgroups. Patients treated with empagliflozin experienced an initial drop in eGFR which returned towards baseline after treatment discontinuation supporting that haemodynamic changes play a role in the acute effects of empagliflozin on eGFR. (See Figure 6.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EMPEROR-Preserved) was conducted in 5 988 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA II-IV) and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >40%) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin 10 mg once daily as adjunct to standard of care therapy. The primary endpoint was the time to adjudicated first event of either cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF). Occurrence of adjudicated HHF (first and recurrent), and eGFR(CKD-EPI)cr slope of change from baseline were included in the confirmatory testing. Baseline therapy included ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (80.7%), beta blockers (86.3%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (37.5%) and diuretics (86.2%).
A total of 2 997 patients were randomised to empagliflozin 10 mg (placebo: 2 991) and followed for a median of 26.2 months. The study population consisted of 55.3% men and 44.7% women with a mean age of 71.9 years (range: 22-100 years), 43.0% were 75 years of age or older. 75.9% of the study population were White, 13.8% Asian and 4.3% Black/African American. At randomisation, 81.5% of patients were NYHA class II, 18.1% were class III and 0.3% were class IV. The EMPEROR-Preserved study population included patients with a LVEF <50% (33.1%), with a LVEF 50 to <60% (34.4%) and a LVEF ≥60% (32.5%). At baseline, the mean eGFR was 60.6 ml/min/1.73 m
2 and the median urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 21 mg/g. About half of the patients (50.1%) had an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m
2, 26.1% of 45 to <60 ml/min/1.73 m
2, 18.6% of 30 to <45 ml/min/1.73 m
2 and 4.9% 20 to <30 ml/min/1.73 m
2.
Empagliflozin was superior in reducing the risk of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure compared with placebo. Additionally, empagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of occurrence of HHF (first and recurrent), and significantly reduced the rate of eGFR decline (Table 17, Figures 7 and 8).
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
The results of the primary composite endpoint were consistent across each of the pre-specified subgroups categorized by e.g., LVEF, diabetes status or renal function (down to an eGFR of 20 ml/min/1.73 m
2).
During treatment, eGFR decline over time was slower in the empagliflozin group compared to the placebo group (see Figure 8). Treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg significantly reduced the rate of eGFR decline and the effect was consistent across all pre-specified subgroups (see Table 17). Patients treated with empagliflozin experienced an initial drop in eGFR which returned towards baseline after treatment discontinuation supporting that haemodynamic changes play a role in the acute effects of empagliflozin on eGFR. (See Figure 8.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Pharmacokinetics: Absorption: The pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin have been extensively characterised in healthy volunteers and patients with T2DM. After oral administration, empagliflozin was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations (C
max) with a median time to reach C
max (t
max) of 1.5 h post-dose. Thereafter, plasma concentrations declined in a biphasic manner with a rapid distribution phase and a relatively slow terminal phase. The steady state mean plasma area under the curve (AUC) was 4740 nmol·h/L and C
max was 687 nmol/L with 25 mg empagliflozin once daily. Systemic exposure of empagliflozin increased in a dose-proportional manner. The single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics parameters of empagliflozin were similar suggesting linear pharmacokinetics with respect to time. There were no clinically relevant differences in empagliflozin pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and patients with T2DM.
Administration of 25 mg empagliflozin after intake of a high-fat and high calorie meal resulted in slightly lower exposure; AUC decreased by approximately 16% and C
max decreased by approximately 37%, compared to fasted condition. The observed effect of food on empagliflozin pharmacokinetics was not considered clinically relevant and empagliflozin may be administered with or without food.
Distribution: The apparent steady-state volume of distribution was estimated to be 73.8 L, based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Following administration of an oral [
14C]-empagliflozin solution to healthy subjects, the red blood cell partitioning was approximately 36.8% and plasma protein binding was 86.2%.
Metabolism: No major metabolites of empagliflozin were detected in human plasma and the most abundant metabolites were three glucuronide conjugates (2-O-, 3-O-, and 6-O-glucuronide). Systemic exposure of each metabolite was less than 10% of total drug-related material.
In vitro studies suggested that the primary route of metabolism of empagliflozin in humans is glucuronidation by the uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases UGT2B7, UGT1A3, UGT1A8, and UGT1A9.
Excretion: The apparent terminal elimination half-life of empagliflozin was estimated to be 12.4 h and apparent oral clearance was 10.6 L/h based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis. The inter-subject and residual variabilities for empagliflozin oral clearance were 39.1% and 35.8%, respectively. With once-daily dosing, steady-state plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were reached by the fifth dose. Consistent with half-life, up to 22% accumulation, with respect to plasma AUC, was observed at steady-state. Following administration of an oral [
14C]-empagliflozin solution to healthy subjects, approximately 95.6% of the drug related radioactivity was eliminated in faeces (41.2%) or urine (54.4%). The majority of drug related radioactivity recovered in faeces was unchanged parent drug and approximately half of drug related radioactivity excreted in urine was unchanged parent drug.
Pharmacokinetics in special patient groups: Pharmacokinetics in children: Studies characterising the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin in paediatric patients have not been performed.
Pharmacokinetics in the elderly: Age did not have a clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Pharmacokinetics in patients with renal impairment: In patients with mild (eGFR: 60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m
2), moderate (eGFR: 30 - <60 mL/min/1.73m
2), severe (eGFR: <30 mL/min/1.73m
2) renal impairment and patients with kidney failure/end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, AUC of empagliflozin increased by approximately 18%, 20%, 66%, and 48%, respectively, compared to subjects with normal renal function. Peak plasma levels of empagliflozin were similar in subjects with moderate renal impairment and kidney failure/ESRD compared to patients with normal renal function. Peak plasma levels of empagliflozin were roughly 20% higher in subjects with mild and severe renal impairment as compared to subjects with normal renal function. In line with the Phase I study, the population pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the apparent oral clearance of empagliflozin decreased with a decrease in eGFR leading to an increase in drug exposure. Based on pharmacokinetics, no dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with renal insufficiency. However, due to the mechanism of action, the efficacy of JARDIANCE is dependent on renal function, and therefore, JARDIANCE is contraindicated for use in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m
2 (see Dosage & Administration, Contraindications and Precautions).
Pharmacokinetics in patients with hepatic impairment: In subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment according to the Child-Pugh classification, AUC of empagliflozin increased approximately by 23%, 47%, and 75% and C
max by approximately 4%, 23%, and 48%, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Based on pharmacokinetics, no dosage adjustment is recommended in patients with hepatic impairment.
Body Mass Index (BMI): No dosage adjustment is necessary based on BMI. Body mass index had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Gender: No dosage adjustment is necessary based on gender. Gender had no clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of empagliflozin based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Race: No dosage adjustment is necessary based on race. Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, AUC was estimated to be 13.5% higher in Asian patients with a BMI of 25 kg/m
2 compared to non-Asian patients with a BMI of 25 kg/m
2.
Toxicology: Preclinical safety data: Genotoxicity: Empagliflozin was not mutagenic or clastogenic in a battery of genotoxicity studies, including the Ames bacterial mutagenicity assay (bacterial reverse mutation),
in vitro mouse lymphoma tk assays and
in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus assays.
Carcinogenicity: Two-year oral carcinogenicity studies were conducted in mice and rats. There was an increase in renal adenomas and carcinomas in male mice given empagliflozin at 1000 mg/kg/day. No renal tumours were seen at 300 mg/kg/day (11- and 28-times the exposure at the clinical dose of 25 mg and 10 mg, respectively). These tumours are likely associated with a metabolic pathway not present in humans, and are considered to be irrelevant to patients given 10 or 25 mg empagliflozin. No drug-related tumours were seen in female mice or female rats at doses up to 1000 and 700 mg/kg/day, respectively, resulting in exposures at least 60 times that expected at the clinical dose of 10 or 25 mg empagliflozin. In male rats, treatment-related benign vascular proliferative lesions (haemangiomas) of the mesenteric lymph node, were observed at 700 mg/kg/day, but not at 300 mg/kg/day (approximately 26- and 65-times the exposure at the clinical does of 25 mg and 10 mg, respectively). These tumours are common in rats and are unlikely to be relevant to humans.