Therapeutic/Pharmacologic Class of Drug: Cobimetinib is a small molecule that is a potent and highly selective targeted inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 tyrosine-threonine kinases.
ATC code: L01XE38.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics:Mechanism of Action: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal regulated kinase (MEK) pathway is a key signaling pathway that regulates cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, cell survival, angiogenesis, and cell migration.
Cobimetinib is an orally available inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2 tyrosine-threonine kinases. It has shown high inhibitory potency in biochemical and cell based assays, as well as anti-tumour activity
in vivo in xenograft tumour models mutated for BRAF. Cobimetinib also showed efficacy in some KRAS mutant models.
In biochemical and structural studies, cobimetinib has been shown to interact with MEK in a manner that is less susceptible to the dynamic conformational changes seen with the phosphorylation state of MEK. As a result cobimetinib maintains binding affinity and inhibitory activity when MEK becomes phosphorylated. Due to this distinct allosteric mechanism of inhibition, cobimetinib has shown strong activity in cancer cell lines and tumours with high phosphorylated MEK levels, as is frequently observed in BRAF mutant tumours.
In pre-clinical studies, treatment of MAPK-dysregulated cancer cells and tumours with cobimetinib results in inhibition of phosphorylation of ERK1/2, the only known substrates of MEK1/2. Functional mediation of the MAPK pathway is dependent upon ERK1/2 activity that phosphorylates protein targets in the cytoplasm and nucleus that induce cell-cycle progression, cell proliferation, survival and migration. Cobimetinib therefore opposes the pro-mitogenic and oncogenic activity induced by the MAPK pathway through inhibition of the MEK1/2 signaling node.
By simultaneously targeting BRAF and MEK the combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib inhibits MAPK pathway reactivation through MEK1/2 resulting in stronger inhibition of signaling, greater tumour cell apoptosis and enhanced tumour responses in pre-clinical models than vemurafenib alone.
Clinical Trials: Study GO28141 (coBRIM): Study GO28141 is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of COTELLIC in combination with ZELBORAF compared to ZELBORAF plus placebo, in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable locally advanced (stage IIIC) or metastatic melanoma (stage IV). Patients with abnormal liver function tests, history of acute coronary syndrome within 6 months, evidence of Class II or greater congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association), active central nervous system lesions, or evidence of retinal pathology were excluded from the study.
Key baseline characteristics included: 58% of patients were male, median age was 55 years (range 23 to 88 years), 60% had metastatic melanoma stage M1c and the proportion of patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 46.3% in the COTELLIC-plus-ZELBORAF arm and 43.0% in the placebo-plus-ZELBORAF arm.
Following confirmation of a BRAF V600 mutation using the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 mutation test, 495 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma were randomised to receive either: COTELLIC 60 mg once daily on Days 1 - 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and 960 mg ZELBORAF twice daily on Days 1-28.
Placebo once daily on Days 1 - 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and 960 mg ZELBORAF twice daily on Days 1 - 28.
Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the investigator (Inv) was the primary endpoint. Secondary efficacy endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response and PFS as assessed by an independent review facility (IRF).
Efficacy results are summarised in Table 1. (See Table 1 and Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Additionally, in a
post hoc analysis with a cut-off date of 16 January 2015, a median PFS benefit of 12.3 months (95% CI 9.5, 13.4) was seen in the COTELLIC-plus-ZELBORAF arm compared to 7.2 months (95% CI 5.6, 7.5) in the placebo-plus-ZELBORAF arm [HR 0.58 (0.46, 0.72)]. The median follow up of patients was 14.2 months.
Global health status/health-related quality of life, symptom severity, and functional interference of symptoms by patient-report were measured for each treatment arm using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scores for all functioning domains (cognitive, emotional, social, role, and physical), and most symptoms (appetite loss, constipation, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, pain, fatigue) did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful change (< 10 point change from baseline) and were similar between the two treatment arms. Patients in the COTELLIC-plus-ZELBORAF arm reported significant worsening of diarrhoea from baseline at only Cycle 1-Day 15 and Cycle 2-Day 15 as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30; but not at subsequent timepoints.
Study NO25395 (BRIM7): The efficacy of COTELLIC was evaluated in a Phase Ib study, NO25395, which was designed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of COTELLIC when added to ZELBORAF for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation (as detected by the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test).
This study treated 129 patients with COTELLIC and ZELBORAF: 63 were naïve to BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) therapy and 66 patients had previously progressed on prior ZELBORAF therapy. Within the BRAFi naïve patient population (n = 63), there were 20 patients (32%) who had received prior systemic therapy.
Results of the BRAFi naïve population from study NO25395 were generally consistent with those from study GO28141. The BRAFi-naïve patients (n = 63) attained an 87% objective response rate, including a complete response in 10% of patients. The median duration of response was 12.5 months. The median PFS for BRAFi-naïve patients was 13.7 months, with median follow-up time of 12.7 months.
Among patients who had progressed on ZELBORAF (n = 66), the objective response rate was 15%, the median duration of response was 6.7 months and the median PFS was 2.8 months.
Pharmacokinetics: Absorption: Following oral dosing of 60 mg in cancer patients, cobimetinib showed a moderate rate of absorption with a median T
max of 2.4 hours. The mean steady-state C
max and AUC
0-24 were 273 ng/mL and 4340 ng.h/mL respectively. The mean accumulation ratio at steady state was approximately 2.4-fold.
Cobimetinib has linear pharmacokinetics in the dose range of ~3.5 mg to 100 mg.
The absolute bioavailability of cobimetinib was 45.9% (90% CI: 39.7%, 53.1%) in healthy subjects. A human mass balance study was conducted in healthy subjects, and showed that cobimetinib was extensively metabolised and eliminated in faeces. The fraction absorbed was ~88% indicating high absorption and first pass metabolism.
The pharmacokinetics of cobimetinib are not altered when administered in the fed state (high-fat meal) compared with the fasted state in healthy subjects. Since food does not alter the pharmacokinetics of cobimetinib, it can be administered with or without food.
Distribution: Cobimetinib is 94.8% bound to human plasma proteins
in vitro. No preferential binding to human red blood cells was observed (blood to plasma ratio 0.93).
The volume of distribution (Vss) was 1050 L in healthy subjects given an intravenous (IV) dose of 2 mg. The apparent volume of distribution (Vss) was 806 L in cancer patients based on population PK analysis.
Metabolism: Oxidation by CYP3A and glucuronidation by UGT2B7 appear to be the major pathways of cobimetinib metabolism. Cobimetinib is the predominant moiety in plasma. No oxidative metabolites greater than 10% of total circulating radioactivity or human specific metabolites were observed in plasma. Unchanged drug in faeces and urine accounted for 6.6% and 1.6% of the administered dose, respectively, indicating that cobimetinib is primarily metabolised with very little renal elimination.
Excretion: Cobimetinib and its metabolites were characterised in a mass balance study in healthy subjects. On average, 94% of the dose was recovered within 17 days. Cobimetinib was extensively metabolised and eliminated in faeces; no single metabolite was predominant.
Following IV administration of a 2 mg dose of cobimetinib, the mean plasma clearance (CL) was 10.7 L/hr. The mean CL/F following oral dosing of 60 mg in cancer patients based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis was 13.4 L/hr.
The mean elimination half-life following oral dosing of cobimetinib was 43.6 hours (range: 23.1 to 69.6 hours).
Pharmacokinetics in Special Populations: Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis, gender, race, ethnicity, baseline ECOG, mild and moderate renal impairment did not affect the PK of cobimetinib. Baseline age and baseline body weight were identified as statistically significant co-variates on cobimetinib clearance and volume of distribution respectively. However, sensitivity analysis suggests neither of these co-variates had a clinically significant impact on steady state exposure.
Gender: Gender does not have an effect on the exposure of cobimetinib, based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis including 210 women and 277 men.
Elderly: Age does not have a clinically significant effect on the exposure of cobimetinib, based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis which included 133 patients ≥ 65 years of age.
Renal Impairment: Based on pre-clinical data and the human mass balance study, cobimetinib is mainly metabolised, with minimal renal elimination. No formal PK study has been conducted in patients with renal impairment.
A population PK analysis using data from 151 patients with mild renal impairment [creatinine clearance (CrCl) 60 to less than 90 mL/min], 48 patients with moderate renal impairment (CrCl 30 to less than 60 mL/min), and 286 patients with normal renal function (CrCl greater than or equal to 90 mL/min), showed that CrCl had no meaningful influence on exposure of cobimetinib.
Mild to moderate renal impairment does not influence cobimetinib exposure based on the population PK analysis. The potential need for dose adjustment in patients with severe renal impairment cannot be determined due to limited data.
Hepatic Impairment: The pharmacokinetics of cobimetinib were evaluated in 6 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child Pugh A), 6 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child Pugh B), 6 subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Child Pugh C) and 10 healthy subjects. Exposures of total cobimetinib after a single dose were similar in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects; while subjects with severe hepatic impairment had lower exposures (AUC
0-∞ geometric mean ratio of 0.69 compared to healthy subjects) which is not considered to be clinically significant. Exploratory analysis of unbound cobimetinib concentrations show that exposure of unbound cobimetinib in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment were similar to subjects with normal hepatic function while subjects with severe hepatic impairment had 2-fold higher exposures.
Therefore, no dose adjustment is recommended when administering COTELLIC to patients with hepatic impairment (see Special Dosage Instructions under DOSAGE & ADMINISTRATION and Liver Laboratory Abnormalities under PRECAUTIONS).
QT Prolongation: No additive clinical effect on QT interval prolongation is observed when patients are treated with COTELLIC in combination with ZELBORAF.
In vitro, cobimetinib produced moderate hERG ion channel inhibition (IC
50 = 0.5 μM [266 ng/mL]), which is approximately 18-fold higher than peak plasma concentrations (C
max) at the 60 mg dose (unbound C
max = 14 ng/mL [0.03 μM]).