Seretide Mechanism of Action

salmeterol + fluticasone




Zuellig Pharma
Full Prescribing Info
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Asthma: Salmeterol Multi-center Asthma Research Trial (SMART): The Salmeterol Multi-center Asthma Research Trial (SMART) was a 28-week US study that evaluated the safety of salmeterol compared to placebo added to usual therapy in adult and adolescent subjects. Although there were no significant differences in the primary endpoint of the combined number of respiratory-related deaths and respiratory-related life-threatening experiences, the study showed a significant increase in asthma-related deaths in patients receiving salmeterol (13 deaths out of 13,176 patients treated with salmeterol versus 3 deaths out of 13,179 patients on placebo). The study was not designed to assess the impact of concurrent inhaled corticosteroid use.
Safety and efficacy of salmeterol-FP versus FP alone in asthma: Two multi-centre 26-week studies were conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of salmeterol-FP versus FP alone, one in adult and adolescent subjects (AUSTRI trial), and the other in paediatric subjects 4-11 years of age (VESTRI trial). For both studies, enrolled subjects had moderate to severe persistent asthma with history of asthma-related hospitalisation or asthma exacerbation in the previous year. The primary objective of each study was to determine whether the addition of LABA to ICS therapy (salmeterol- FP) was non-inferior to ICS (FP) alone in terms of the risk of serious asthma related events (asthma-related hospitalisation, endotracheal intubation, and death). A secondary efficacy objective of these studies was to evaluate whether ICS/LABA (salmeterol-FP) was superior to ICS therapy alone (FP) in terms of severe asthma exacerbation (defined as deterioration of asthma requiring the use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days or an in-patient hospitalisation or emergency department visit due to asthma that required systemic corticosteroids).
A total of 11,679 and 6,208 subjects were randomized and received treatment in the AUSTRI and VESTRI trials, respectively. For the primary safety endpoint, noninferiority was achieved for both trials (see Table 1 as follows).

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

For the secondary efficacy endpoint, reduction in time to first exacerbation for salmeterol-FP relative to FP was seen in both studies, however only AUSTRI met statistical significance: (see Table 2.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Twelve month study: A large twelve-month study (Gaining Optimal Asthma ControL, GOAL) in 3416 asthma patients compared the efficacy and safety of SERETIDE versus inhaled corticosteroid alone in achieving pre-defined levels of asthma control. Treatment was stepped-up every 12 weeks until "Total control" was achieved or the highest dose of study drug was reached. Control needed to be sustained for at least 7 out of the last 8 weeks of treatment. The study showed that: 71% of patients treated with SERETIDE achieved # 'Well-controlled' asthma compared with 59% of patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid alone.
41% of patients treated with SERETIDE achieved ## 'Total control' of asthma compared with 28% of patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid alone.
These effects were observed earlier with SERETIDE compared with inhaled corticosteroid alone and at a lower inhaled corticosteroid dose.
The GOAL study also showed that: The rate of exacerbations was 29% lower with SERETIDE compared to inhaled corticosteroid treatment alone.
Attaining 'Well controlled' and 'Totally controlled' asthma improved Quality of Life (QoL). 61% of patients reported minimal or no impairment on QoL, as measured by an asthma specific quality of life questionnaire, after treatment with SERETIDE compared to 8% at baseline.
#Well controlled asthma; less than or equal to 2 days with symptom score greater than 1 (symptom score 1 defined as 'symptoms for one short period during the day'), SABA use on less than or equal to 2 days and less than or equal to 4 ocassions/week, greater than or equal to 80% predicted morning peak expiratory flow, no night-time awakenings, no exacerbations and no side effects enforcing a change in therapy.
## Total control of asthma; no symptoms, no SABA use, greater than or equal to 80% predicte morning peak expiratory flow, no night-time awakenings, no exacerbations and no side effects enforcing a change in therapy.
Two further studies have shown improvements in lung function, percentage of symptom free days and reduction in rescue medication use, at 60% lower inhaled corticosteroid dose with SERETIDE compared to treatment with inhaled corticosteroid alone, whilst the control of the underlying airway inflammation, measured by bronchial biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage, was maintained.
Additional studies have shown that treatment with SERETIDE significantly improves asthma symptoms, lung function and reduces the use of rescue medication compared to treatment with the individual components alone and placebo. Results from GOAL show that the improvements seen with SERETIDE, in these endpoints, are maintained over at least 12 months.
COPD: Symptomatic COPD patients without restriction to 10% reversibility to a short acting beta2- agonist: Placebo-controlled clinical trials, over 6 months, have shown that regular use of both SERETIDE 50/250 and 50/500 micrograms rapidly and significantly improves lung function, significantly reduced breathlessness and the use of relief medication. There were also significant improvements in health status.
Symptomatic COPD patients who demonstrated less than 10% reversibility to a short acting beta2-agonist: Placebo-controlled clinical trials, over 6 and 12 months, have shown that regular use of SERETIDE 50/500 micrograms rapidly and significantly improves lung function, significantly reduced breathlessness and the use of relief medication. Over a 12-month period the risk of COPD exacerbations and the need for additional courses of oral corticosteroids was significantly reduced. There were also significant improvements in health status.
SERETIDE 50/500 micrograms was effective in improving lung function and health status and reducing the risk of COPD exacerbations, in both current and ex-smokers.
Fluticasone propionate containing medications in asthma during pregnancy: An observational retrospective epidemiological cohort study utilising electronic health records from the United Kingdom was conducted to evaluate the risk of MCMs following first trimester exposure to inhaled FP alone and SERETIDE relative to non-FP containing ICS. No placebo comparator was included in this study.
Within the asthma cohort of 5362 first trimester ICS-exposed pregnancies, 131 diagnosed MCMs were identified; 1612 (30%) were exposed to FP or SERETIDE of which 42 diagnosed MCMs were identified. The adjusted odds ratio for MCMs diagnosed by 1 year was 1.1 (95%CI: 0.5 – 2.3) for FP exposed vs non-FP ICS exposed women with moderate asthma and 1.2 (95%CI: 0.7 – 2.0) for women with considerable to severe asthma. No difference in the risk of MCMs was identified following first trimester exposure to FP alone versus SERETIDE. Absolute risks of MCM across the asthma severity strata ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 per 100 FP-exposed pregnancies which is comparable to results from a study of 15,840 pregnancies unexposed to asthma therapies in the General Practice Research Database (2.8 MCM events per 100 pregnancies).
Accuhaler: Torch study (Towards a Revolution in COPD Health): TORCH was a 3-year study to assess the effect of treatment with SERETIDE Accuhaler 50/500 micrograms twice daily, salmeterol Accuhaler 50 micrograms twice daily, FP Accuhaler 500 micrograms twice daily or placebo on all-cause mortality in patients with COPD. Patients with moderate to severe COPD with a baseline (pe-bronchodilator) FEV1 <60% of predicted normal were randomisd to double-blind medication. During the study, patients were permitted usual COPD therapy with the exception of other inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting bronchodilators, and long-term systemic corticosteroids. Survival status at 3 years was determined for all patients regardless of withdrawal from study medication. The primary endpoint was reduction in all-cause mortality at 3 years for SERETIDE vs placebo. (See Table 3.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

SERETIDE reduced the risk of dying at any time durin the 3 years by 17.5% compared to placebo (Hazard Ration 0.825 (95% CI 0.68, 1.00, p=0.052; all adjusted for interim analyses). There was a 12% reduction in the risk of dying at any time within 3 years from any cause for salmeterol compared with placebo (p=0.180) and a 6% increase for FP compared with placebo (p=0.525).
A supporting analysis using Cox's Proportional Hazards model gave a hazard ration of 0.811 (95% CI 0.670, 0.982, p=0.031) for SERETIDE vs placebo which represented a 19% reduction in the risk of dying at any time within 3 years. The model adjusted for important factors (smoking statis, age, sex, region, baseline FEV1 and Body Mass Index). There was no evidence that treatment effects varied for these factors.
The percentage of patients who died within 3 years due to COPD-related causes was 6.0% for placebo, 6.1% for salmeterol, 6.9% for FP and 4.7% for SERETIDE.
SERETIDE reduced the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations by 25% (95% CI: 19% to 31%; p<0.001) compared with placebo. SERETIDE reduced the exacerbation rate by 12% compared with salmeterol (95% CI; 5% to 19%, p=0.002) and 9% compared with FP (95% CI: 1% to 16%, p=0.024). Salmeterol and FP significantly reduced exacerbation rates compared with placebo by 15% (95% CI: 7% to 22%; p<0.001) ans 18% (95% CI: 11% to 24%; p<0.001) respectively.
Health Related Quality of Life, as measured by the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRO) was improved by all active treatments in comparison with placebo. The average improvement by all active treatments in comparison with placebo. The average improvement over three years for SERETIDE compared with placebo was -3.1 units (95% CI: -4.1 to -2.1; p<0.001), compared with salmeterol was -2.2 units (p<0.001) and compared with FP was -1.2 units (p=0.017).
Over the 3 year treatment period, FEV1 values were higher in subjects treated with SERETIDE than for those treated with placebo (average difference over 3 years 92 mL, 95% CI: 75 to 108 mL; p<0.001). SERETIDE was also more effective than salmeterol or FP in improving FEV1 (average difference 50 mL, p<0.001 for salmeterol and 44 mL, p<0.001 for FP).
The estimated 3 year probability of having pneumonia reported as an adverse event was 12.3% for placebo, 13.3% for salmeterol, 18.3% for FP and 19.6% for SERETIDE (Hazard ration for SERETIDE vs placebo: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.01, p<0.001). There was no increase in pneumonia related deaths; deaths while on treatment that were adjudicated as primarily due to pneumonia were 7 for placebo, 9 for salmeterol, 13 for FP and 8 for SERETIDE. There was no significant difference in probability of bone fracture (5.1% placebo; 5.1% salmeterol, 5.4% FP and 6.3% SERETIDE; Hazard ration for SERETIDE vs placebo: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.72, p=0.248). The incidence of adverse events of eye disorders, bone disorders, and HPA axis disorders was low and there was no difference observed between treatments. There was no evidence of an increase in cardiac adverse events in the treatment groups receiving salmeterol.
Mechanism of action: SERETIDE contains salmeterol and fluticasone propionate which have differing modes of action.
Salmeterol protects against symptoms, fluticasone propionate improves lung function and prevents exacerbations of the condition. SERETIDE can offer a more convenient regime for patients on concurrent beta-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The respective mechanisms of action of both drugs are discussed as follows: Salmeterol: Salmeterol is a selective long-acting (12 hour) beta2-adrenoceptor agonist with a long side chain which binds to the exo-site of the receptor.
These pharmacological properties of salmeterol offer more effective protection against histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and produce a longer duration of bronchodilation, lasting for at least 12 hours, than recommended doses of conventional short-acting beta2-agonists.
In vitro tests have shown salmeterol is a potent and long-lasting inhibitor of the release, from human lung, of mast cell mediators such as histamine, leukotrienes and prostaglandin D2.
In man salmeterol inhibits the early and late phase response to inhaled allergen; the latter persisting for over 30 hours after a single dose when the bronchodilator effect is no longer evident. Single dosing with salmeterol attenuates bronchial hyper-responsiveness. These properties indicate that salmeterol has additional non-bronchodilator activity but the full clinical significance is not yet clear. This mechanism is different from the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids.
Fluticasone propionate: Fluticasone propionate given by inhalation at recommended doses has a potent glucocorticoid anti-inflammatory action within the lungs, resulting in reduced symptoms and exacerbations of asthma, without the adverse effects observed when corticosteroids are administered systemically.
Daily output of adrenocortical hormones usually remain within the normal range during chronic treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate, even at the highest recommended doses in children and adults. After transfer from other inhaled steroids, the daily output gradually improves despite past and present intermittent use of oral steroids, thus demonstrating return of normal adrenal function on inhaled fluticasone propionate. The adrenal reserve also remains normal during chronic treatment, as measured by a normal increment on a stimulation test. However, any residual impairment of adrenal reserve from previous treatment may persist for a considerable time and should be borne in mind (see Precautions).
Pharmacokinetics: There is no evidence in animal or human subjects that the administration of salmeteril and fluticasone propionate together by the inhaled route affects the pharmacokinetics of either component.
For pharmacokinetic purposes, therefore each component can be considered separately.
In a placebo-controlled, crossover drug interaction study in 15 healthy subjects, co-administration of Serevent (50 mcg twice daily inhaled) and the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole (400 mg once daily orally) for 7 days resulted in a significant increase in plasma salmeterol exposure (1.4-fold peak plasma concentration, Cmax and 15-fold area under the concentration-time curve, AUC). There was no increase in salmeterol accumulation with repeat dosing. Three (3) subjects were withdrawn from Serevent and ketoconazole co-administration due to QTc prolongation or palpitations with sinus tachycardia. In the remaining 12 subjects, co-administration of Serevent and ketoconazole did not result in a clinically significant effect on heart rate, blood potassium or QTc duration (see Precautions and Interactions).
Salmeterol: Salmeterol acts locally in the lungs, therefore, plasma levels are not an indication of therapeutic effects. In addition, there are only limited data available on the pharmacokinetics of salmeterol because of the technical difficulty of assaying the drug in plasma due to the low plasma concentrations at therapeutic doses (approximately ≤200 pg/mL) achieved after inhaled dosing. After regular dosing with salmeterol xinafoate, hydroxynaphthoic acid can be detected in the systemic circulation, reaching steady-state concentrations of approximately 100 ng/mL. These concentrations are up to 1000-fold lower than steady-state levels observed in toxicity studies. No detrimental effects have been seen following long-term regular dosing (>12 months) in patients with airway obstruction.
An in vitro study showed that salmeterol is extensively metabolised to α-hydroxysalmeterol (aliphatic oxidation) by cytochrome 450 (CYP450) 3A4. A repeat dose study with salmeterol and erythromycin in healthy volunteers showed no clinically significant changes in pharmacodynamic effects at 500 mg 3 times daily doses of erythromycin. However, a salmeterol-ketoconazole interaction study resulted in a significant increase in plasma salmeterol exposure (see Precautions and Interactions).
Fluticasone Propionate: The absolute bioavailability of fluticasone propionate for each of the available inhaler devices has been estimated from within and between study comparisons of inhaled and IV pharmacokinetic data. In healthy adult subjects, the absolute bioavailability has been estimated for fluticasone propionate Accuhaler/Diskus (7.8%), fluticasone propionate Diskhaler (9%), fluticasone propionate Evohaler (10.9%), salmeterol-fluticasone propionate Evohaler (5.3%) and salmeterol-fluticasone propionate Accuhaler/Diskus (5.5%), respectively. In patients with asthma or COPD, a lesser degree of systemic exposure to inhaled fluticasone propionate has been observed. Systemic absorption occurs mainly through the lungs and is initially rapid, then prolonged. The remainder of the inhaled dose may be swallowed but contributes minimally to systemic exposure due to low aqueous solubility and presystemic metabolism, resulting in oral bioavailability of <1%. There is a linear increase in systemic exposure with increasing inhaled dose. The disposition of fluticasone propionate is characterized by high plasma clearance (1150 mL/min), a large volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss) (approximately 300 L) and a terminal half-life (t½) of approximately 8 hrs. Plasma protein-binding is moderately high (91%). Fluticasone propionate is cleared very rapidly from the systemic circulation, principally by metabolism to an inactive carboxylic acid metabolite, by CYP450 enzyme CYP3A4.
The renal clearance of fluticasone propionate is negligible (<0.2%) and <5% as the metabolite. Care should be taken when co-administering known CYP3A4 inhibitors, as there is a potential for increased systemic exposure to fluticasone propionate.
Special Patient Populations: Seretide: Accuhaler: Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed utilising data for asthmatic subjects (9 clinical studies for fluticasone propionate and 5 studies for salmeterol) and showed the following: Higher fluticasone propionate exposure was seen following administration of Seretide 50/100 mcg compared to fluticasone propionate 100 mcg alone in adolescents and adults [ratio 1.52 (90% CI 1.08, 2.13)] and children [ratio 1.2 (90% CI 1.06, 1.37)].
Higher fluticasone propionate exposure observed in children taking Seretide 50/100 mcg compared to adolescents and adults [ratio 1.63 (90% CI 1.35, 1.96)].
The clinical relevance of these findings are not known, however, no differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA)-axis effects were observed in clinical studies of up to 12 weeks duration comparing Seretide 50/100 mcg and fluticasone propionate 100 mcg in both adolescents and adults and in children.
Fluticasone propionate exposure was similar at the higher Seretide 50/500 mcg dose compared to the equivalent fluticasone propionate dose alone.
Higher salmeterol exposure was observed in children taking Seretide 50/100 mcg compared to adolescents and adults [ratio 1.23 (90% CI 1.1, 1.38)].
The clinical relevance of these findings are not known, however, there were no differences observed in cardiovascular effects or reports of tremor between adults, adolescents and children in clinical studies of up to 12 weeks duration.
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: Salmeterol xinafoate and fluticasone propionate have been extensively evaluated in animal toxicity tests. Significant toxicities occurred only at doses in excess of those recommended for human use and were those expected for a potent beta2-adrenoreceptor agonist and glucocorticosteroid. Neither salmeterol xinafoate or fluticasone propionate have shown any potential for genetic toxicity.
In long-term studies, salmeterol xinafoate induced benign tumours of smooth muscle in the mesovarium of rats and the uterus of mice.
Rodents are sensitive to the formation of these pharmacologically-induced tumours. Salmeterol is not considered to represent a significant oncogenic hazard in man.
Co-administration of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate resulted in some cardiovascular interactions at high doses. In rats, mild atrial myocarditis and focal coronary arteritis were transient effects that resolved with regular dosing. In dogs, heart rate increases were greater after co-administration than after salmeterol alone. No clinically relevant serious adverse cardiac effects have been observed in studies in man.
Co-administration did not modify other class-related toxicities in animals.
Evohaler: The non-CFC propellant, HFA134a, has been shown to have no toxic effect at very high vapour concentrations, far in excess of those likely to be experienced by patients, in a wide range of animal species exposed daily for periods of 2 years
Register or sign in to continue
Asia's one-stop resource for medical news, clinical reference and education
Sign up for free
Already a member? Sign in