5,175 patients participated in clinical trials for safety of this drug which was evaluated from 5 controlled clinical studies on which 2,613 of these patients received Amlodipine and Valsartan concomitantly. Adverse reaction is summarized as very commonly (≥1/10,000, <1/1,000), very rarely (<1/10,000) including single report according to incidence frequency. It is also summarized in order that seriousness of adverse reaction is reduced in groups of same frequency. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Valsartan: See Table 2.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
In no association with causality of drug, following symptoms were reported during the clinical studies: Insomnia, sexual desire disorder, pharyngitis, rhinitis, sinusitis, upper respiratory tract infection, virus infection. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Additional information on concomitant therapy: In double-blind, drug or placebo controlled clinical trials, incidence frequency of peripheral edema was statistically low in concomitant therapy group (5.8%) in contrast to amlodipine single therapy (9%).
Additional information on each active ingredient: Although it was not observed in the clinical studies and post marketing surveillance, previously reported adverse reactions of each ingredient may occur.
Amlodipine: In no association with causality of drug, adverse reactions reported at amlodipine clinical studies are as follows: See Table 4.
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Post marketing surveillance: As a result of investigation on 859 patients for 6 years for the purpose of re-evaluation, hazardous case occurrence was reported 5.12% (44 patients, 56 cases) irrespective of causal relationship.
Drug hazardous reaction occurrence of which can't rule out causal relationship with this drug was 1.75% (15 patients, 19 cases) in which occurred headache 0.47% (4 patients, 4 cases), dizziness 0.35% (3 patients, 3 cases), pruritus 0.35% (3 patients, 3 cases), peripheral edema 0.23% (2 patients, 2 cases), hypotension 0.23% (2 patients, 2 cases), each 1 case of edema, chest pain, pain, cough and enuresis. Critical hazardous case was not reported regardless causal relationship with this drug. As unexpected hazardous case, there were reported chest discomfort, reflux esophagitis, neck pain, hypercholesterolemia, hypoglycemia and enuresis, 9 cases in total.
As a result of integrated evaluation of local re-evaluation hazardous cases and voluntary side effect report data of this drug comparing with those of all the other marketed drugs, newly confirmed hazardous cases are as follows out of those statistically significant in comparison with hazardous cases reported from all the other drugs. However, this result does not mean that causal relationship between the corresponding ingredients and the following hazardous cases was proven.
General abnormality: Chest pain, weight gain.
Musculoskeletal system: Arthritis, osteocope, rhabdomyolysis.
Mouth: Gingiva hyperplasia.
Gastrointestinal system: Gastritis.
Psychiatric system abnormality.