Neupogen

Neupogen Special Precautions

filgrastim

Manufacturer:

Amgen

Distributor:

Zuellig Pharma
Full Prescribing Info
Special Precautions
General: Neupogen should not be used to increase the dose of cytotoxic chemotherapy beyond established dosage regimens.
Neupogen should not be administered to patients with severe congenital neutropenia who develop leukaemia or have evidence of leukaemic evolution.
Hypersensitivity, including anaphylactic reactions, occurring on initial or subsequent treatment have been reported in patients treated with Neupogen. Permanently discontinue Neupogen in patients with clinically significant hypersensitivity. Do not administer Neupogen to patients with a history of hypersensitivity to filgrastim or pegfilgrastim.
As with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity. Rates of generation of antibodies against filgrastim is generally low. Binding antibodies do occur as expected with all biologics; however, they have not been associated with neutralising activity at present.
Aortitis: Aortitis has been reported after G-CSF administration in healthy subjects and in cancer patients. The symptoms experienced included fever, abdominal pain, malaise, back pain and increased inflammatory markers (e.g. c-reactive protein and white blood cell count). In most cases aortitis was diagnosed by CT scan and generally resolved after withdrawal of GCSF.
Malignant cell growth: Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor can promote growth of myeloid cells in vitro and similar effects may be seen on some non-myeloid cells in vitro.
The safety and efficacy of Neupogen administration in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, or chronic myelogenous leukemia have not been established.
Neupogen is not indicated for use in these conditions. Particular care should be taken to distinguish the diagnosis of blast transformation of chronic myeloid leukemia from acute myeloid leukemia.
In view of limited safety and efficacy data in patients with secondary AML, Neupogen should be administered with caution.
The safety and efficacy of Neupogen administration in de novo AML patients aged <55 years with good cytogenetics (t(8;21), t(15;17), and inv(16)) have not been established.
Other special precautions: Monitoring of bone density may be indicated in patients with underlying osteoporotic bone diseases who undergo continuous therapy with Neupogen for more than 6 months.
Pulmonary adverse effects, in particular interstitial lung disease, have been reported after G-CSF administration. Patients with a recent history of lung infiltrates or pneumonia may be at higher risk. The onset of pulmonary signs, such as cough, fever and dyspnoea in association with radiological signs of pulmonary infiltrates and deterioration in pulmonary function may be preliminary signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Neupogen should be discontinued and appropriate treatment given.
Capillary leak syndrome has been reported after granulocyte-colony stimulating factor administration, and is characterised by hypotension, hypoalbuminaemia, oedema and hemoconcentration. Patients who develop symptoms of capillary leak syndrome should be closely monitored and receive standard symptomatic treatment, which may include a need for intensive care (see Adverse Reaction).
Glomerulonephritis has been reported in patients receiving filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. Generally, events of glomerulonephritis resolved after dose reduction or withdrawal of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. Urinalysis monitoring is recommended.
The needle cover of the pre-filled syringe may contain dry natural rubber (a derivative of latex), which may cause allergic reactions.
Special precautions in cancer patients: Cases of splenomegaly and splenic rupture have been reported uncommonly following administration of filgrastim. Some cases of splenic rupture were fatal. Individuals receiving filgrastim who report left upper abdominal and/or shoulder tip pain should be evaluated for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture.
Leukocytosis: White blood cell counts of 100 x 109/l or greater have been observed in less than 5% of patients receiving Neupogen at doses above 0.3 MU/kg/day (3 μg/kg/day). No undesirable effects directly attributable to this degree of leukocytosis have been reported. However, in view of the potential risks associated with severe leukocytosis, a white blood cell count should be performed at regular intervals during Neupogen therapy. If leukocyte counts exceed 50 x 109/l after the expected nadir, Neupogen should be discontinued immediately. However, during the period of administration of Neupogen for PBPC mobilization, Neupogen should be discontinued or its dosage should be reduced if the leukocyte counts rise to >70 x 109/l.
Risks associated with increased doses of chemotherapy: Special caution should be used when treating patients with high-dose chemotherapy, because improved tumour outcome has not been demonstrated and intensified doses of chemotherapeutic agents may lead to increased toxicities including cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and dermatologic effects (please refer to the prescribing information of the specific chemotherapy agents used).
Treatment with Neupogen alone does not preclude thrombocytopenia and anemia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Because of the potential of receiving higher doses of chemotherapy (e.g. full doses of the prescribed schedule), the patient may be at greater risk of thrombocytopenia and anemia. Regular monitoring of platelet count and hematocrit is recommended. Special care should be taken when administering single or combination chemotherapeutic agents which are known to cause severe thrombocytopenia.
The use of Neupogen mobilised PBPCs has been shown to reduce the depth and duration of thrombocytopenia following myelosuppressive or myeloablative chemotherapy.
Other special precautions: The effects of Neupogen in patients with substantially reduced myeloid progenitors have not been studied. Neupogen acts primarily on neutrophil precursors to exert its effect in elevating neutrophil counts. Therefore in patients with reduced precursors neutrophil response may be diminished (such as those treated with extensive radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or those with bone marrow infiltration by tumour).
Vascular disorders, including veno-occlusive disease and fluid volume disturbances, have been reported occasionally in patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy followed by transplantation.
There have been reports of GvHD and fatalities in patients receiving G-CSF after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (see Adverse Reactions).
Increased haematopoietic activity of the bone marrow in response to growth factor therapy has been associated with transient abnormal bone scans. This should be considered when interpreting bone-imaging results.
Special precautions in patients undergoing PBPC mobilisation: Mobilisation: There are no prospectively randomised comparisons of the two recommended mobilisation methods (Neupogen alone, or in combination with myelosuppressive chemotherapy) within the same patient population. The degree of variation between individual patients and between laboratory assays of CD34+ cells mean that direct comparison between different studies is difficult. It is therefore difficult to recommend an optimum method. The choice of mobilisation method should be considered in relation to the overall objectives of treatment for an individual patient.
Prior exposure to cytotoxic agents: Patients who have undergone very extensive prior myelosuppressive therapy may not show sufficient mobilisation of PBPC to achieve the recommended minimum yield (≥ 2.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg) or acceleration of platelet recovery, to the same degree.
Some cytotoxic agents exhibit particular toxicities to the haematopoietic progenitor pool, and may adversely affect progenitor mobilisation. Agents such as melphalan, carmustine (BCNU), and carboplatin, when administered over prolonged periods prior to attempts at progenitor mobilisation may reduce progenitor yield. However, the administration of melphalan, carboplatin or BCNU together with Neupogen, has been shown to be effective for progenitor mobilisation. When a PBPC transplantation is envisaged it is advisable to plan the stem cell mobilisation procedure early in the treatment course of the patient. Particular attention should be paid to the number of progenitors mobilised in such patients before the administration of high-dose chemotherapy. If yields are inadequate, as measured by the previously mentioned criteria, alternative forms of treatment, not requiring progenitor support should be considered.
Assessment of progenitor cell yields: In assessing the number of progenitor cells harvested in patients treated with Neupogen, particular attention should be paid to the method of quantitation. The results of flow cytometric analysis of CD34+ cell numbers vary depending on the precise methodology used and recommendations of numbers based on studies in other laboratories need to be interpreted with caution.
Statistical analysis of the relationship between the number of CD34+ cells re-infused and the rate of platelet recovery after high-dose chemotherapy indicates a complex but continuous relationship.
The recommendation of a minimum yield of ≥ 2.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg is based on published experience resulting in adequate haematologic reconstitution. Yields in excess of this appear to correlate with more rapid recovery, those as follows with slower recovery.
Special precautions in normal donors undergoing PBPC mobilisation: Mobilisation of PBPC does not provide a direct clinical benefit to normal donors and should only be considered for the purposes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
PBPC mobilisation should be considered only in donors who meet normal clinical and laboratory eligibility criteria for stem cell donation with special attention to haematological values and infectious disease.
The safety and efficacy of Neupogen have not been assessed in normal donors < 16 years or > 60 years.
Thrombocytopenia has been reported very commonly in patients receiving Neupogen. Platelet counts should therefore be monitored closely.
Transient thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100 x 109/l) following filgrastim administration and leukapheresis was observed in 35% of subjects studied. Among these, two cases of platelets < 50 x 109/l were reported and attributed to the leukapheresis procedure.
If more than one leukapheresis is required, particular attention should be paid to donors with platelets < 100 x 109/l prior to leukapheresis; in general apheresis should not be performed if platelets < 75 x 109/l.
Leukapheresis should not be performed in donors who are anticoagulated or who have known defects in hemostasis.
Neupogen administration should be discontinued or its dosage should be reduced if the leukocyte counts rise to >70 x 109/l.
Donors who receive G-CSFs for PBPC mobilization should be monitored until hematological indices return to normal.
Transient cytogenetic abnormalities have been observed in normal donors following G-CSF use. The significance of these changes is unknown. Nevertheless, a risk of promotion of a malignant myeloid clone cannot be excluded. It is recommended that the apheresis centre perform a systematic record and tracking of the stem cell donors for at least 10 years to ensure monitoring of long-term safety.
Common but generally asymptomatic cases of splenomegaly and uncommon cases of splenic rupture have been reported in healthy donors (and patients) following administration of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs). Some cases of splenic rupture were fatal. Therefore, spleen size should be carefully monitored (e.g. clinical examination, ultrasound). A diagnosis of splenic rupture should be considered in donors and/or patients reporting left upper abdominal pain or shoulder tip pain.
In normal donors, dyspnoea has been reported commonly and other pulmonary adverse events (haemoptysis, pulmonary haemorrhage, lung infiltrates, and hypoxia) have been reported uncommonly. In case of suspected or confirmed pulmonary adverse events, discontinuation of treatment with Neupogen should be considered and appropriate medical care given.
Special precautions in recipients of allogeneic PBPCs mobilised with Neupogen: Current data indicate that immunological interactions between the allogeneic PBPC graft and the recipient may be associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic GvHD when compared with bone marrow transplantation.
Special precautions in SCN patients: Blood cell counts: Thrombocytopenia has been reported commonly in patients receiving Neupogen. Platelet counts should be monitored closely, especially during the first few weeks of Neupogen therapy. Consideration should be given to intermittent cessation or decreasing the dose of Neupogen in patients who develop thrombocytopenia, i.e., platelets consistently < 100,000/mm3.
Other blood cell changes occur, including anaemia and transient increases in myeloid progenitors, which require close monitoring of cell counts.
Transformation to leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: Special care should be taken in the diagnosis of SCNs to distinguish them from other haematopoietic disorders such as aplastic anaemia, myelodysplasia, and myeloid leukaemia. Complete blood cell counts with differential and platelet counts, and an evaluation of bone marrow morphology and karyotype should be performed prior to treatment.
There was a low frequency (approximately 3%) of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or leukaemia in clinical trial patients with SCN treated with Neupogen. This observation has only been made in patients with congenital neutropenia. MDS and leukaemias are natural complications of the disease and are of uncertain relation to Neupogen therapy. A subset of approximately 12% of patients who had normal cytogenetic evaluations at baseline were subsequently found to have abnormalities, including monosomy 7, on routine repeat evaluation. If patients with severe chronic neutropenia develop abnormal cytogenetics, the risks and benefits of continuing Neupogen should be carefully weighed; Neupogen should be discontinued if MDS or leukaemia occur. It is currently unclear whether long-term treatment of patients with SCN will predispose patients to cytogenetic abnormalities, MDS or leukaemic transformation. It is recommended to perform morphologic and cytogenetic bone marrow examinations in patients at regular intervals (approximately every 12 months).
Other special precautions: Causes of transient neutropenia, such as viral infections, should be excluded.
Cases of splenomegaly have been reported very commonly and cases of splenic rupture have been reported commonly following administration of filgrastim. Individuals receiving filgrastim who report left upper abdominal and/or shoulder tip pain should be evaluated for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture.
Splenomegaly is a direct effect of treatment with Neupogen. Thirty-one percent (31%) of patients in studies were documented as having palpable splenomegaly. Increases in volume, measured radiographically, occurred early during Neupogen therapy and tended to plateau. Dose reductions were noted to slow or stop the progression of splenic enlargement, and in 3% of patients a splenectomy was required. Spleen size should be evaluated regularly. Abdominal palpation should be sufficient to detect abnormal increases in splenic volume.
Haematuria was common and proteinuria occurred in a small number of patients. Regular urinalysis should be performed to monitor this event.
The safety and efficacy in neonates and patients with autoimmune neutropenia have not been established.
Special precautions in patients with HIV infection: Cases of splenomegaly have been reported commonly following administration of Neupogen. Individuals receiving filgrastim who report left upper abdominal and/or shoulder tip pain should therefore be evaluated for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture.
Blood cell counts: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) should be monitored closely, especially during the first few weeks of Neupogen therapy. Some patients may respond very rapidly and with a considerable increase in neutrophil count to the initial dose of Neupogen. It is recommended that the ANC is measured daily for the first 2-3 days of Neupogen administration. Thereafter, it is recommended that the ANC is measured at least twice per week for the first two weeks and subsequently once per week or once every other week during maintenance therapy. During intermittent dosing with 30 MU (300 μg)/day of Neupogen, there can be wide fluctuations in the patient's ANC over time. In order to determine a patient's trough or nadir ANC, it is recommended that blood samples are taken for ANC measurement immediately prior to any scheduled dosing with Neupogen.
Risk associated with increased doses of myelosuppressive medications: Treatment with Neupogen alone does not preclude thrombocytopenia and anaemia due to myelosuppressive medications. As a result of the potential to receive higher doses or a greater number of these medications with Neupogen therapy, the patient may be at higher risk of developing thrombocytopenia and anaemia. Regular monitoring of blood counts is recommended (see previously mentioned text).
Infections and malignancies causing myelosuppression: Neutropenia may be due to bone marrow infiltrating opportunistic infections such as Mycobacterium avium complex or malignancies such as lymphoma. In patients with known bone marrow infiltrating infections or malignancy, consider appropriate therapy for treatment of the underlying condition, in addition to administration of Neupogen for treatment of neutropenia. The effects of Neupogen on neutropenia due to bone marrow infiltrating infection or malignancy have not been well established.
Special precautions in sickle cell trait and sickle cell disease: Sickle cell crises, in some cases fatal, have been reported with the use of Neupogen in patients with sickle cell trait or sickle cell disease. Physicians should use caution when prescribing Neupogen in patients with sickle cell trait or sickle cell disease.
All patients: Neupogen contains sorbitol (E420). Patients with rare hereditary problems of fructose intolerance should not take this medicine.
Neupogen vial contains less than 1 mmol (23 mg) sodium per 0.3 mg/ml, i.e. essentially sodium free.
Neupogen (30 MU) pre-filled syringe contains less than 1 mmol (23 mg) sodium per 0.6 mg/ml, i.e. essentially sodium free.
Neupogen (48 MU) pre-filled syringe contains less than 1 mmol (23 mg) sodium per 0.96 mg/ml, i.e. essentially sodium free.
In order to improve the traceability of granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs), the trade name of the administered product should be clearly recorded in the patient file.
Renal Impairment: See Special Dosage Instructions under Dosage & Administration.
Hepatic Impairment: See Special Dosage Instructions under Dosage & Administration.
Ability to Drive and Use Machines: No studies on the effects on the ability to drive and use machines have been performed.
Paediatric Use: Established cytotoxic chemotherapy: The safety and efficacy of Neupogen are similar in adults and children receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy.
In patients undergoing myelosuppressive or myeloablative therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: The safety and efficacy of Neupogen have not been assessed in normal donors < 16 years.
In patients with severe chronic neutropenia (SCN): The safety and efficacy in neonates have not been established.
Long term administration of Neupogen is indicated in children with severe congenital, cyclic or idiopathic neutropenia with an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≤ 0.5 x 109/l, and a history of severe or recurrent infections, to increase neutrophil counts and to reduce the incidence and duration of infection-related events (see Special Dosage Instructions under Dosage & Administration).
Paediatric use in the SCN and cancer settings: Sixty-five percent of patients studied in the SCN trial program were under 18 years of age. The efficacy of treatment was clear for this age group, which included most patients with congenital neutropenia. There were no differences in the safety profiles for paediatric patients treated for severe chronic neutropenia.
Geriatric Use: In patients undergoing myelosuppressive or myeloablative therapy followed by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: The safety and efficacy of Neupogen have not been assessed in normal donors > 60 years.
Exclusive offer for doctors
Register for a MIMS account and receive free medical publications worth $139 a year.
Sign up for free
Already a member? Sign in