Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antibacterials for systemic use, cephalosporins.
ATC Code: J01DI02.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Mechanism of action: Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
In-vitro studies have shown that ceftaroline is bactericidal, due to inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs). Ceftaroline is also active against methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-nonsusceptible
Streptococcus pneumoniae (PNSP) due to its affinity for the altered PBPs found in these organisms.
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship: As with other beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, the percent time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting organism over the dosing interval (%T >MIC) has been shown to best correlate with the antimicrobial activities for ceftaroline.
Mechanisms of resistance: Ceftaroline is not active against strains of
Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) from the TEM, SHV or CTX-M families, serine carbapenemases (such as KPC), class B metallo-beta-lactamases or class C (AmpC cephalosporinases). One or more of these mechanisms may co-exist in the same bacterium.
Interaction with other antimicrobials: In vitro studies have not demonstrated any antagonism between ceftaroline in combination with other commonly used antibacterial agents (e.g. amikacin, azithromycin, aztreonam, daptomycin, levofloxacin, linezolid, meropenem, tigecycline, and vancomycin).
Susceptibility testing breakpoints: Ceftaroline susceptibility criteria are recommended based on pharmacokinetics and correlation of clinical and microbiological outcomes with zone diameter and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the infecting organisms.
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints for susceptibility testing are presented as follows. (See Table 1.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Susceptibility: The prevalence of acquired resistance may vary geographically and with time for selected species. Local information on resistance is desirable, particularly when treating severe infections. As necessary, expert advice should be sought when the local prevalence of resistance is such that the utility of the agent is questionable.
The susceptibility to ceftaroline of a given clinical isolate should be determined by standard methods. Interpretations of test results should be made in accordance with local infectious diseases and clinical microbiology guidelines.
Clinical efficacy against specific pathogens: Efficacy has been demonstrated in clinical studies against the pathogens listed under each indication that were susceptible to ceftaroline
in vitro.
Complicated skin and soft tissue infections: Gram-positive organisms:
Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains);
Streptococcus pyogenes; Streptococcus agalactiae; Streptococcus anginosus group (includes
S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus);
Streptococcus dysgalactiae.
Gram-negative organisms:
Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Klebsiella oxytoca; Morganella morganii.
Community-acquired pneumonia: Gram-positive organisms:
Streptococcus pneumoniae; Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains only).
Gram-negative organisms:
Escherichia coli; Haemophilus influenzae; Haemophilus parainfluenzae; Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Antibacterial activity against other relevant pathogens:
Clinical efficacy has not been established against the following pathogens although
in vitro studies suggest that they would be susceptible to ceftaroline in the absence of required resistance mechanisms.
Anaerobic Gram-positive organisms:
Peptostreptococcus species.
Anaerobic Gram-negative organisms:
Fusobacterium species.
In vitro data indicate that the following species are not susceptible to ceftaroline:
Chlamydophila spp.;
Legionella spp.;
Mycoplasma spp.;
Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Clinical efficacy and safety: Complicated skin and soft tissue infections: A total of 1396 adults with documented complicated skin and soft tissue infections were enrolled in two identical randomised, multi-centre, multinational, double-blind studies (Studies 1 and 2) comparing Zinforo (600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours) to vancomycin plus aztreonam (1 g vancomycin administered intravenously over 60 minutes followed by 1 g aztreonam administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours). Patients with deep/extensive cellulites, a major abscess, a wound infection (surgical or traumatic), infected bites, burns or ulcers, or any lower extremity infection in patients with either pre-existing diabetes mellitus or peripheral vascular disease, were eligible for the studies. Treatment duration was 5 to 21 days. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included all patients who received any amount of study drug according to their randomised treatment group. The clinically evaluable (CE) population included patients in the MITT population with sufficient adherence to the protocol.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the Test of Cure (TOC) visit in the co-primary populations of the CE and MITT patients in the table as follows. (See Table 2.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in the microbiologically evaluable patients are presented as follows. (See Table 3.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Community-acquired pneumonia: A total of 1240 adults with a diagnosis of CAP were enrolled in two randomized, multi-centre, multinational, double-blind studies comparing Zinforo (600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours) to ceftriaxone (1 g ceftriaxone administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 24 hours). The studies were identical except in one respect, in FOCUS 1 both treatment groups received 2 doses of oral clarithromycin (500 mg every 12 hours) as adjunctive therapy starting on Day 1. No adjunctive macrolide therapy was used in FOCUS 2. Patients with new or progressive pulmonary infiltrate(s) on chest radiography with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with CAP with the need for hospitalisation and intravenous therapy were enrolled in the studies. Treatment duration was 5 to 7 days. The modified intent- to-treat efficacy (MITTE) population included all patients who received any amount of study drug according to their randomized treatment group and were in PORT Risk Class III or IV. The clinically evaluable (CE) population included patients in the MITTE population with sufficient adherence to the protocol.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response at the Test of Cure (TOC) visit in the co-primary populations of the CE and MITTE populations in the table as follows. (See Table 4.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in the microbiologically evaluable patients are presented in the table as follows. (See Table 5.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Asia CAP study: A total of 771 adults with a diagnosis of CAP were enrolled in a randomized, multi-centre, double-blind study in Asia comparing Zinforo (600 mg administered intravenously over 60 minutes every 12 hours) to ceftriaxone (2 g administered intravenously over 30 minutes every 24 hours). Treatment duration was 5 to 7 days. The primary objective was to determine the non-inferiority in the clinical cure rate of ceftaroline treatment compared with that of ceftriaxone treatment at the TOC visit in the CE population of adult hospitalised patients with CAP (lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rate [ceftaroline - ceftriaxone] greater than -10%).
The non-inferiority of ceftaroline 600 mg versus ceftriaxone 2 g was demonstrated in both the CE and MITT populations (Tables 2 and 3). Furthermore, based on the pre-defined criteria (lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the difference in response rate greater than 0%), the superiority of ceftaroline 600 mg versus ceftriaxone 2 g was demonstrated in adult patients with PORT Risk Class III/IV CAP in Asia. (See Tables 6, 7 and 8.)
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Click on icon to see table/diagram/image
Paediatric studies: A study was conducted in paediatric patients aged 2 months to <18 years with cSSTI. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ceftaroline versus vancomycin or cefazolin with or without aztreonam.
A study was conducted in paediatric patients aged 2 months to <18 years with CAP. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ceftaroline versus ceftriaxone.
The studies demonstrated that ceftaroline is generally well tolerated in paediatric patients from 2 months to <18 years of age. Clinical cure rates at TOC were high and similar for both treatment groups in the MITT and CE populations.
Pharmacokinetics: The C
max and AUC of ceftaroline increase approximately in proportion to dose within the single dose range of 50 to 1000 mg. No appreciable accumulation of ceftaroline is observed following multiple intravenous infusions of 600 mg administered over 60 minutes every 12 hours for up to 14 days in healthy adults with normal renal function.
Distribution: The plasma protein binding of ceftaroline is low (approximately 20%) and ceftaroline is not distributed into erythrocytes. The median steady-state volume of distribution of ceftaroline in healthy adult males following a single 600 mg intravenous dose of radiolabeled ceftaroline fosamil was 20.3 L, similar to the volume of extracellular fluid.
Metabolism: Ceftaroline fosamil (prodrug), is converted into the active ceftaroline in plasma by phosphatase enzymes and concentrations of the prodrug are measurable in plasma primarily during intravenous infusion. Hydrolysis of the beta-lactam ring of ceftaroline occurs to form the microbiologically inactive, open-ring metabolite, ceftaroline M-1. The mean plasma ceftaroline M-1 to ceftaroline AUC ratio following a single 600 mg intravenous infusion of ceftaroline fosamil in healthy subjects is approximately 20-30%.
In pooled human liver microsomes, metabolic turnover was low for ceftaroline, indicating that ceftaroline is not metabolised by hepatic CYP450 enzymes.
Excretion: Ceftaroline is primarily eliminated by the kidneys. Renal clearance of ceftaroline is approximately equal, or slightly lower than the glomerular filtration rate in the kidney, and
in vitro transporter studies indicate that active secretion does not contribute to the renal elimination of ceftaroline.
The mean terminal elimination half-life of ceftaroline in healthy adults is approximately 2.5 hours.
Following the administration of a single 600 mg intravenous dose of radiolabeled ceftaroline fosamil to healthy male adults, approximately 88% of radioactivity was recovered in urine and 6% in faeces.
Special populations: Patients with renal impairment: Dosage adjustments are required in adults, adolescents and children with CrCL ≤50 ml/min (see Dosage & Administration).
There is insufficient information to recommend dosage adjustments in adolescents with ESRD aged from 12 to <18 years and with bodyweight <33 kg and in children with ESRD aged from 2 to <12 years. There is insufficient information to recommend dosage adjustments in children aged <2 years with moderate or severe renal impairment or ESRD.
Patients with hepatic impairment: The pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in patients with hepatic impairment have not been established. As ceftaroline does not appear to undergo significant hepatic metabolism, the systemic clearance of ceftaroline is not expected to be significantly affected by hepatic impairment. Therefore, no dosage adjustment is recommended for patients with hepatic impairment.
Elderly patients: Following administration of a single 600 mg intravenous dose of Zinforo, the pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline was similar between healthy elderly subjects (≥65 years of age), and healthy young adult subjects (18-45 years of age). There was a slight 33% increase in AUC
0-∞ in the elderly that was mainly attributable to age-related changes in renal function. Zinforo dose adjustment is not required in elderly patients with creatinine clearance above 50 ml/min.
Paediatric patients: Dose adjustments are required for children aged from 2 months to <12 years and for adolescents aged 12 to <18 years with bodyweight <33 kg (see Dosage & Administration). The safety and efficacy of Zinforo in children aged birth to <2 months have not been established.
Gender: The pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline were similar between males and females. No dose adjustment is required based on gender.
Race: Race was evaluated as a covariate in a population pharmacokinetic analysis on data from the clinical studies. No significant differences in ceftaroline pharmacokinetics were observed in Caucasian, Hispanic, Black, Asian or other subjects. No dosage adjustment is recommended based on race.
Toxicology: Preclinical safety data: The kidney was the primary target organ of toxicity in both the monkey and rat. Histopathologic findings included pigment deposition and inflammation of the tubular epithelium. Renal changes were not reversible but were reduced in severity following a 4 week recovery period.
Convulsions have been observed at relatively high exposures during single and multi dose studies in both the rat and monkey (≥7 times to the estimated C
max level of a 600 mg twice a day).
Other important toxicologic findings noted in the rat and monkey included histopathologic changes in the bladder and spleen.
Genetic toxicology: Ceftaroline fosamil and ceftaroline were clastogenic in an
in vitro chromosomal aberration assay, however there was no evidence of mutagenic activity in an Ames, mouse lymphoma and unscheduled DNA synthesis assay. Furthermore,
in vivo micronucleus assays in rat and mouse were negative. Carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted.
Reproductive toxicology: Reproductive studies in pregnant rabbits resulted in an increased foetal incidence of angulated hyoid alae, a common skeletal variation in rabbit foetuses, at exposures similar to 600 mg twice daily in humans. In the rat, no adverse effects were observed on embryofoetal development, fertility or postnatal development.
Juvenile toxicity: Intravenous bolus dosing of ceftaroline fosamil to suckling rats from post-natal day 7 to 20 was well tolerated at plasma exposure approximately 2-fold higher than those for paediatric patients.