Triplixam Mechanism of Action




Full Prescribing Info
Pharmacotherapeutic Group: ACE inhibitors, combinations. ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blockers and diuretics. ATC Code: C09BX01.
Pharmacology: Pharmacodynamics: Triplixam is a combination of three antihypertensive components with complementary mechanisms to control blood pressure in patient with hypertension. Perindopril arginine salt is an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, indapamide, a chlorosulphamoyl diuretic and amlodipine, a calcium ion flux inhibitor of the dihydropyridine group.
The pharmacological properties of Triplixam are derived from those of each of the components taken separately. In addition, the combination of perindopril/ indapamide produces an additive synergy of the antihypertensive effects of the two components.
Mechanism of action: Perindopril: Perindopril is an inhibitor of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE inhibitor) which converts angiotensin I to angiotensin II, a vasoconstricting substance; in addition the enzyme stimulates the secretion of aldosterone by the adrenal cortex and stimulates the degradation of bradykinin, a vasodilatory substance, into inactive heptapeptides.
This results in: a reduction in aldosterone secretion; an increase in plasma renin activity, since aldosterone no longer exercises negative feedback; a reduction in total peripheral resistance with a preferential action on the vascular bed in muscle and the kidney, with no accompanying salt and water retention or reflex tachycardia, with chronic treatment.
The antihypertensive action of perindopril also occurs in patients with low or normal renin concentrations. 
Perindopril acts through its active metabolite, perindoprilat. The other metabolites are inactive. Perindopril reduces the work of the heart: by a vasodilatory effect on veins, probably caused by changes in the metabolism of prostaglandins: reduction in pre-load; by reduction of the total peripheral resistance: reduction in afterload.
Studies carried out on patients with cardiac insufficiency have shown: a reduction in left and right ventricular filling pressures; a reduction in total peripheral vascular resistance; an increase in cardiac output and an improvement in the cardiac index; an increase in regional blood flow in muscle. 
Exercise test results also showed improvement.
Indapamide: Indapamide is a sulfonamide derivative with an indole ring, pharmacologically related to the thiazide group of diuretics. Indapamide inhibits the reabsorption of sodium in the cortical dilution segment. It increases the urinary excretion of sodium and chlorides and, to a lesser extent, the excretion of potassium and magnesium, thereby increasing urine output and having an antihypertensive action.
Amlodipine: Amlodipine is a calcium ion influx inhibitor of the dihydropyridine group (slow calcium channel blocker or calcium ion antagonist) and inhibits the transmembrane influx of calcium ions into cardiac and vascular smooth muscle.
Pharmacodynamic effects: Perindopril/indapamide: In hypertensive patients regardless of age, the perindopril/indapamide combination exerts a dose-dependent antihypertensive effect on diastolic and systolic arterial pressure whilst supine or standing. During clinical trials, the concomitant administration of perindopril and indapamide produced antihypertensive effects of a synergic nature in relation to each of the products administered alone.
Perindopril: Perindopril is active in all grades of hypertension: mild to moderate or severe. A reduction in systolic and diastolic arterial pressure is observed in the lying and standing position.
The antihypertensive activity after a single dose is maximal at between 4 and 6 hours and is maintained over 24 hours.
There is a high degree of residual blocking of angiotensin converting enzyme at 24 hours, approximately 80%.
In patients who respond, normalised blood pressure is reached after one month and is maintained without tachyphylaxis.
Withdrawal of treatment has no rebound effect on hypertension.
Perindopril has vasodilatory properties and restores elasticity of the main arterial trunks, corrects histomorphometric changes in resistance arteries and produces a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy.
If necessary, the addition of a thiazide diuretic leads to an additive synergy.
The combination of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor with a thiazide diuretic decreases the hypokalaemia risk associated with the diuretic alone.
Indapamide: Indapamide, as monotherapy, has an antihypertensive effect which lasts for 24 hours. This effect occurs at doses at which the diuretic properties are minimal.
Its antihypertensive action is proportional to an improvement in arterial compliance and a reduction in total and arteriolar peripheral vascular resistance.
Indapamide reduces left ventricular hypertrophy.
When a dose of thiazide diuretic and thiazide-related diuretics is exceeded, the antihypertensive effect reaches a plateau, whereas the adverse effects continue to increase. If the treatment is ineffective, the dose should not be increased.
Furthermore, it has been shown that in the short-term, mid-term and long-term in hypertensive patients, indapamide: has no effect on lipid metabolism: triglycerides, LDL-cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol; has no effect on carbohydrate metabolism, even in diabetic hypertensive patients.
Amlodipine: The mechanism of the antihypertensive action of amlodipine is due to a direct relaxant effect on vascular smooth muscle. The precise mechanism by which amlodipine relieves angina has not been fully determined but amlodipine reduces total ischaemic burden by the following two actions: Amlodipine dilates peripheral arterioles and thus, reduces the total peripheral resistance (afterload) against which the heart works. Since the heart rate remains stable, this unloading of the heart reduces myocardial energy consumption and oxygen requirements.
The mechanism of action of amlodipine also probably involves dilatation of the main coronary arteries and coronary arterioles, both in normal and ischaemic regions. This dilatation increases myocardial oxygen delivery in patients with coronary artery spasm (Prinzmetal's or variant angina).
In patients with hypertension, once daily dosing provides clinically significant reductions of blood pressure in both the supine and standing positions throughout the 24 hour interval. Due to the slow onset of action, acute hypotension is not a feature of amlodipine administration.
Amlodipine has not been associated with any adverse metabolic effects or changes in plasma lipids and is suitable for use in patients with asthma, diabetes, and gout.
Clinical efficacy and safety: Triplixam has not been studied on morbidity and mortality.
Perindopril/indapamide: PICXEL, a multicenter, randomised, double blind active controlled study has assessed on echocardiography the effect of perindopril/indapamide combination on LVH versus enalapril monotherapy.
In PICXEL, hypertensive patients with LVH (defined as left ventricular mass index (LVMI) > 120 g/m2 in male and > 100 g/m2 in female) were randomised either to perindopril tert-butylamine 2 mg (equivalent to 2.5 mg perindopril arginine)/indapamide 0.625 mg or to enalapril 10 mg once a day for a one-year treatment. The dose was adapted according to blood pressure control, up to perindopril tert-butylamine 8 mg (equivalent  to 10 mg perindopril arginine) and indapamide 2.5 mg or enalapril 40 mg once a day. Only 34% of the subjects remained treated with perindopril tert-butylamine 2 mg (equivalent to 2.5 mg perindopril arginine)/indapamide 0.625mg (versus 20% with enalapril 10mg).
At the end of treatment, LVMI had decreased significantly more in the perindopril/indapamide group (-10.1 g/m²) than in the enalapril group (-1.1 g/m²) in the all randomised patients population. The between group difference in LVMI change was -8.3 (95% CI (-11.5,-5.0), p < 0.0001).
A better effect on LVMI was reached with higher perindopril/indapamide doses than those licensed for perindopril/indapamide 2.5mg/0.625mg and perindopril/indapamide 5mg/1.25mg.
Regarding blood pressure, the estimated mean between-group differences in the randomised population were - 5.8 mmHg (95% CI (-7.9, -3.7), p < 0.0001) for systolic blood pressure and -2.3 mmHg (95% CI (-3.6,-0.9), p= 0.0004) for diastolic blood pressure respectively, in favour of the perindopril/indapamide group.
The ADVANCE study was a multicentre, international, randomised, 2x2 factorial designed trial aimed at determining the benefits of Blood Pressure lowering with the fixed combination perindopril / indapamide vs placebo on top of current standard therapy (double blind comparison) and of gliclazide MR based intensive glucose control strategy (HbA1c target of 6.5% or lower) vs standard glucose control (PROBE [Prospective Randomised Open study with Blinded Evaluation] design) on major macrovascular and microvascular events in type 2 diabetic patients.
The primary end-point was a composite of major macrovascular (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) and microvascular (new or worsening nephropathy and eye disease) events.
Overall, 11 140 type 2 diabetic patients (mean values: age 66 years, BMI 28 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 8 years, HbA1c 7.5% and SBP/DBP 145/81 mmHg) were involved in the trial. Among them, 83% were hypertensive, 32% and 10% presented a history of macro- or micro- vascular disease respectively and 27% had microalbuminuria. Concomitant therapies included BP lowering agents (75%), lipid  lowering agents (35% mainly statins 28%), aspirin or other antiplatelets (47%).
Following a 6-week run-in period on open perindopril / indapamide combination and usual glucose lowering treatment, patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=5571) or perindopril / indapamide combination (n=5569).
After a mean duration of follow-up of 4.3 years, the treatment with perindopril / indapamide resulted in a significant relative risk reduction of 9 % in the primary endpoint (95%CI [0.828;0.996], p=0.041).
This benefit was driven by a significant relative risk reduction of 14 % in total mortality (95%CI [0.75;0.98], p=0.025), of 18% in cardiovascular deaths (95%CI [0.68;0.98], p=0.027) and of 21% in total renal events (95%CI [0.74;0.86], p<0.001) in the perindopril / indapamide group compared to the placebo group.
In the sub-group of interest of hypertensive patients, there was a relative risk reduction of 9 % in the combined major macrovascular and microvascular events in the perindopril / indapamide group compared to the placebo group (95%CI [0.82;1.00], p=0.052).
There were also a significant relative risk reduction of 16 % in total mortality (95%CI [0.73;0.97], p=0.019), of 20 % in cardiovascular deaths (95%CI [0.66;0.97], p=0.023) and of 20 % in total renal events (95%CI [0.73;0.87], p<0.001) in the perindopril / indapamide group compared to the placebo group.
The benefits of the BP lowering intervention were independent of those observed with the intensive glucose control strategy.
Amlodipine: A randomized double-blind morbidity-mortality study called the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was performed to compare newer drug therapies: amlodipine 2.5-10 mg/d (calcium channel blocker) or lisinopril 10-40 mg/d (ACE inhibitor) as first-line therapies to that of the thiazide-diuretic, chlorthalidone 12.5-25 mg/d in mild to moderate hypertension.”
A total of 33,357 hypertensive patients aged 55 or older were randomized and followed for a mean of 4.9 years. The patients had at least one additional CHD risk factor, including: previous myocardial infarction or stroke (> 6 months prior to enrollment) or documentation of other atherosclerotic CVD (overall 51.5%), type2 diabetes (36.1%), HDL-C < 35 mg/dL (11.6%), left ventricular hypertrophy diagnosed by  electrocardiogram or echocardiography (20.9%), current cigarette smoking (21.9%).
The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal CHD or non-fatal myocardial infarction. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint between amlodipine-based therapy and chlorthalidone-based therapy: RR 0.98 (95% CI (0.90-1.07) p=0.65. Among secondary endpoints, the incidence of heart failure (component of a composite combined cardiovascular endpoint) was significantly higher in the amlodipine group as compared to the chlorthalidone group (10.2% vs. 7.7%, RR 1.38, (95% CI [1.25-1.52] p<0.001)). However, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between amlodipine-based therapy and chlorthalidone-based therapy. RR 0.96 (95% CI [0.89-1.02] p=0.20).
Dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) clinical trial data: Two large randomised, controlled trials (ONTARGET (ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) and VA NEPHRON-D (The Veterans Affairs Nephropathy in Diabetes)) have examined the use of combination of an ACE-inhibitor with an angiotensin II receptor blocker.
ONTARGET was a study conducted in patients with a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease,  or type 2 diabetes mellitus accompanied by evidence of end-organ damage. VA NEPHRON-D was a study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy.
These studies have shown no significant beneficial effect on renal and/or cardiovascular outcomes and mortality, while an increased risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and/or hypotension as compared to monotherapy was observed.
Given their similar pharmacodynamic properties, these results are also relevant for other ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.
ACE-inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers should therefore not be used concomitantly in patients with diabetic nephropathy.
ALTITUDE (Aliskiren Trial in Type 2 Diabetes Using Cardiovascular and Renal Disease Endpoints) was a study designed to test the benefit of adding aliskiren to a standard therapy of an ACE-inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, or both. The study was terminated early because of an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Cardiovascular death and stroke were both numerically more frequent in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group and adverse events and serious adverse events of interest (hyperkalaemia, hypotension and renal dysfunction) were more frequently reported in the aliskiren group than in the placebo group.
Paediatric population: No data are available with Triplixam in children.
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with Triplixam in all subsets of the paediatric population in hypertension (see Dosage & Administration for information on paediatric use).
Pharmacokinetics: Triplixam: The co-administration of perindopril/indapamide and amlodipine does not change their pharmacokinetic properties by comparison to separate administration.
Perindopril: Absorption and bioavailability: After oral administration, the absorption of perindopril is rapid and the peak concentration is achieved within 1 hour (perindopril is a prodrug and perindoprilat the active metabolite). The plasma half-life of perindopril is equal to 1 hour. As ingestion of food decreases conversion to perindoprilat, hence bioavailability, perindopril arginine should be administered orally in a single daily dose in the morning before a meal.
Distribution: The volume of distribution is approximately 0.2 L/kg for unbound perindoprilat. Protein binding of perindoprilat to plasma proteins is 20%, principally to angiotensin converting enzyme, but is concentration-dependent.
Biotransformation: Perindopril is a prodrug. Twenty seven percent of the administered perindopril dose reaches the bloodstream as the active metabolite perindoprilat. In addition to active perindoprilat, perindopril yields five metabolites, all inactive. The peak plasma concentration of perindoprilat is achieved within 3 to 4 hours.
Elimination: Perindoprilat is eliminated in the urine and the terminal half-life of the unbound fraction is approximately 17 hours, resulting in steady-state within 4 days.
Linearity / non-linearity: It has been demonstrated a linear relationship between the dose of perindopril and its plasma exposure.
Special Populations: Use in the older people: Elimination of perindoprilat is decreased in the elderly, and also in patients with heart or renal failure.
Renal impairment: Dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency is desirable depending on the degree of impairment (creatinine clearance).
In case of dialysis: clearance of perindoprilat is equal to 70 mL/min.
In patients with cirrhosis: Perindopril pharmacokinetics is modified, hepatic clearance of the parent molecule is reduced by half. However, the quantity of perindoprilat formed is not reduced and therefore no dosage adjustment is required (see Dosage & Administration and Precautions).
Indapamide: Absorption: Indapamide is rapidly and completely absorbed from the digestive tract. The peak plasma level is reached in humans approximately one hour after oral administration of the product.
Distribution: Plasma protein binding is 79 %.
Metabolism and Elimination: The elimination half-life is between 14 and 24 hours (average 18 hours). Repeated administration does not produce accumulation.
Elimination is mainly in the urine (70 % of the dose) and faeces (22 %) in the form of inactive metabolites.
Special populations: The pharmacokinetics is unchanged in patients with renal insufficiency.
Amlodipine: Absorption and Bioavailability: After oral administration of therapeutic doses, amlodipine is well absorbed with peak blood levels between 6-12 hours post dose. Absolute bioavailability has been estimated to be between 64 and 80%.
The bioavailability of amlodipine is not affected by food intake.
Distribution: The volume of distribution is approximately 21 L/kg. In vitro studies have shown that approximately 97.5% of circulating amlodipine is bound to plasma proteins.
Metabolism: Amlodipine is extensively metabolised by the liver to inactive metabolites with 10% of the parent compound and 60% of metabolites excreted in the urine.
Elimination: The terminal plasma elimination half-life is about 35-50 hours and is consistent with once daily dosing.
Special populations: Use in the older people: the time to reach peak plasma concentrations of amlodipine is similar in elderly and younger subjects. Amlodipine clearance tends to be decreased with resulting increases in AUC and elimination half-life in elderly patients. Increases in AUC and elimination half-life in patients with congestive heart failure were as expected for the patient age group studied.
Use in patients with impaired hepatic function: Very limited clinical data are available regarding amlodipine administration in patients with hepatic impairment. Patients with hepatic insufficiency have decreased clearance of amlodipine resulting in a longer half-life and an increase in AUC of approximately 40-60%.
Toxicology: Preclinical Safety Data: Perindopril: In the chronic oral toxicity studies (rats and monkeys), the target organ is the kidney, with reversible damage. No mutagenicity has been observed in in vitro or in vivo studies.
Reproduction toxicology studies (rats, mice, rabbits and monkeys) showed no sign of embryotoxicity or teratogenicity. However, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, as a class, have been shown to induce adverse effects on late fetal development, resulting in fetal death and congenital effects in rodents and rabbits: renal lesions and an increase in peri- and postnatal mortality have been observed. Fertility was not impaired either in male or in female rats.
No carcinogenicity has been observed in long term studies in rats and mice.
Indapamide: The highest doses administered orally to different animal species (40 to 8000 times the therapeutic dose) have shown an exacerbation of the diuretic properties of indapamide. The major symptoms of poisoning during acute toxicity studies with indapamide administered intravenously or intraperitoneally were related to the pharmacological action of indapamide, i.e. bradypnoea and peripheral vasodilation.
Indapamide has been tested negative concerning mutagenic and carcinogenic properties.
Reproductive toxicity studies have not shown any embryotoxic or teratogenic effect in rat, mice and rabbit. Fertility was not impaired either in male or female rats.
Perindopril / indapamide: The perindopril/indapamide combination has slightly increased toxicity than that of its components. Renal manifestations do not seem to be potentiated in the rat. However, the combination produces gastro-intestinal toxicity in the dog and the toxic effects on the mother seem to be increased in the rat (compared to perindopril).
Nonetheless, these adverse effects appear at dose levels corresponding to a very marked safety margin by comparison to the therapeutic doses used.
Preclinical studies performed separately with perindopril and indapamide did not show genotoxic, carcinogenic or teratogenic potential.
Amlodipine: Reproductive studies in rats and mice have shown delayed date of delivery, prolonged duration of labour and decreased pup survival at dosages approximately 50 times greater than the maximum recommended dosage  for humans based on mg/kg.
There was no effect on the fertility of rats treated with amlodipine (males for 64 days and females 14 days prior to mating) at doses up to 10 mg/kg/day (8 times* the maximum recommended human dose of 10 mg on a mg/m2 basis). In another rat study in which male rats were treated with amlodipine besilate for 30 days at a dose comparable with the human dose based on mg/kg, decreased plasma follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone were found as well as decreases in sperm density and in the number of mature spermatids and Sertoli cells.
Rats and mice treated with amlodipine in the diet for two years, at concentrations calculated to provide daily dosage levels of 0.5, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg/day showed no evidence of carcinogenicity. The highest dose (for mice, similar to, and for rats twice* the maximum recommended clinical dose of 10 mg on a mg/m2 basis) was close to the maximum tolerated dose for mice but not for rats.
Mutagenicity studies revealed no drug related effects at either the gene or chromosome levels.
* Based on patient weight of 50 kg
Register or sign in to continue
Asia's one-stop resource for medical news, clinical reference and education
Sign up for free
Already a member? Sign in