Spiriva Respimat

Spiriva Respimat Tác dụng

tiotropium bromide

Nhà sản xuất:

Boehringer Ingelheim
Thông tin kê toa chi tiết tiếng Anh
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Other drugs for obstructive airway diseases, inhalants, anticholinergics. ATC code: R03B B04.
Pharmacology: Tiotropium bromide is a long-acting, specific antimuscarinic agent, in clinical medicine often called an anticholinergic. It has a similar affinity to the subtypes of muscarinic receptors M1 to M5. In the airways, inhibition of M3-receptors at the smooth muscle results in relaxation. The competitive and reversible nature of antagonism was shown with human and animal origin receptors and isolated organ preparations. In non-clinical in vitro as well as in vivo studies bronchoprotective effects were dose-dependent and lasted longer than 24 hours. The long duration of effect is likely to be due to its very slow dissociation from M3-receptors, exhibiting a significantly longer dissociation half-life than that seen with ipratropium. As an N-quaternary anticholinergic tiotropium is topically (broncho-) selective when administered by inhalation, demonstrating an acceptable therapeutic range before giving rise to systemic anti-cholinergic effects. Dissociation from M2-receptors is faster than from M3, which in functional in vitro studies, elicited (kinetically controlled) receptor subtype selectivity of M3 over M2.
The high potency and slow receptor dissociation found its clinical correlate in significant and long-acting bronchodilation in patients with COPD and asthma. The bronchodilation following inhalation of tiotropium is primarily a local effect (on the airways) not a systemic one.
COPD: The clinical Phase III programme for COPD included two 1-year, two 12-weeks and two 4-weeks randomised, double-blind studies in 2901 COPD patients (1038 receiving the 5 mcg tiotropium dose). The 1-year programme consisted of two placebo-controlled trials. The two 12-week trials were both active (ipratropium) - and placebo-controlled. All six studies included lung function measurements. In addition, the two 1-year studies included health outcome measures of dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and effect on exacerbations.
Placebo-controlled studies: Lung function: SPIRIVA RESPIMAT, administered once daily, provided significant improvement in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity) within 30 minutes following the first dose, compared to placebo. Improvement of lung function was maintained for 24 hours at steady state.
Pharmacodynamic steady state was reached within one week. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT significantly improved morning and evening PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate) as measured by patient's daily recordings. The use of SPIRIVA RESPIMAT resulted in a reduction of rescue bronchodilator use compared to placebo.
The bronchodilator effects of SPIRIVA RESPIMAT were maintained throughout the 48-week period of administration with no evidence of tolerance.
A combined analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, clinical studies demonstrated that the bronchodilator response for SPIRIVA RESPIMAT (5 mcg) was numerically higher compared to SPIRIVA HandiHaler (18 mcg) inhalation powder after a 4-week treatment period.
Dyspnoea, Health-related Quality of Life, COPD Exacerbations in long-term 1 year studies: (a) SPIRIVA RESPIMAT significantly improved dyspnoea (as evaluated using the Transition Dyspnoea Index). An improvement was maintained throughout the treatment period.
(b) Patients' evaluation of their Quality of Life (as measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) showed that SPIRIVA RESPIMAT had positive effects on the psychosocial impacts of COPD, activities affected by COPD and distress due to COPD symptoms. The improvement in mean total score between SPIRIVA RESPIMAT versus placebo at the end of the two 1-year studies was statistically significant and maintained throughout the treatment period.
(c) COPD Exacerbations: In three one-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials SPIRIVA RESPIMAT treatment resulted in a significantly reduced risk of a COPD exacerbation in comparison to placebo. Exacerbations of COPD were defined as "a complex of at least two respiratory events/symptoms with a duration of three days or more requiring a change in treatment (prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids and/or a significant change of the prescribed respiratory medication)". SPIRIVA RESPIMAT treatment resulted in a reduced risk of a hospitalisation due to a COPD exacerbation (significant in the appropriately powered large exacerbation trial).
The pooled analysis of two Phase III trials and separate analysis of an additional exacerbation trial is displayed in Table 1. All respiratory medications except anticholinergics and long-acting beta-agonists were allowed as concomitant treatment, i.e. rapidly acting beta-agonists, inhaled corticosteroids and xanthines. Long-acting beta-agonists were allowed in addition in the exacerbation trial. (See Table 1.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

Long-term tiotropium active-controlled study: A long term, large scale, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study with a treatment period up to 3 years has been performed to compare the efficacy and safety of SPIRIVA RESPIMAT and SPIRIVA HANDIHALER (5,711 patients receiving SPIRIVA RESPIMAT 2.5 microgram (5 microgram medicinal dose); 5,694 patients receiving SPIRIVA HANDIHALER). The primary endpoints were time to first COPD exacerbation, time to all-cause mortality and in a sub-study (906 patients) trough FEV1 (pre-dose).
The time to first COPD exacerbation was similar during the study with SPIRIVA RESPIMAT and SPIRIVA HANDIHALER (hazard ratio (SPIRIVA RESPIMAT/SPIRIVA HANDIHALER) 0.98 with a 95% CI of 0.93 to 1.03).
The median number of days to the first COPD exacerbation was 756 days for SPIRIVA RESPIMAT and 719 days for SPIRIVA HANDIHALER.
The bronchodilator effect of SPIRIVA RESPIMAT was sustained over 120 weeks, and was similar to SPIRIVA HANDIHALER. The mean difference in trough FEV1 for SPIRIVA RESPIMAT versus SPIRIVA HANDIHALER was -0.010 L (95% CI -0.038 to 0.018 mL).
All-cause mortality was similar during the study with SPIRIVA RESPIMAT and SPIRIVA HANDIHALER (hazard ratio (SPIRIVA RESPIMAT/SPIRIVA HANDIHALER) 0.96 with a 95% CI of 0.84 to 1.09).
Asthma: The clinical Phase III programme for persistent asthma included two 1-year, two 6-month and one 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in a total of 3,476 asthma patients (1,128 receiving SPIRIVA RESPIMAT) on background treatment of at least ICS or ICS/LABA. The two 6-month studies were also active-controlled (salmeterol). All 5 studies included lung function measurements, assessments of symptoms including exacerbations, and health-related quality of life.
In the two 1-year PrimoTinA-asthma studies in patients who were symptomatic on maintenance treatment of at least high-dose ICS plus LABA, SPIRIVA RESPIMAT showed significant improvements in lung function over placebo when used as add-on to background treatment.
At week 24, mean improvements in peak and trough FEV1 were 0.110 litres (95% CI: 0.063 to 0.158 litres, p<0.0001) and 0.093 litres (95% CI: 0.050 to 0.137 litres, p<0.0001), respectively.
The improvement of lung function compared to placebo was maintained for 24hours.
At week 24, SPIRIVA RESPIMAT significantly improved morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF; mean improvement in the morning 23 L/min; 95% CI: 16 to 29 L/min, p<0.0001; evening 26 L/min; 95% CI: 20 to 33 L/min, p<0.0001).
The bronchodilator effects of SPIRIVA RESPIMAT were maintained throughout the 1 year period of administration with no evidence of tachyphylaxis or tolerance.
SPIRIVA RESPIMAT significantly reduced the risk of severe asthma exacerbations (see Table 2).

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) responder rates defined as percentage of patients improving by at least 0.5 points, were significantly higher with SPIRIVA RESPIMAT (53.9% versus 46.9%; p=0.0427).
The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) mean scores for SPIRIVA RESPIMAT improved significantly over placebo at week 24.
In the two 6-month MezzoTinA-asthma studies in patients who were symptomatic on maintenance treatment of medium-dose ICS, SPIRIVA RESPIMAT showed significant improvements in lung function over placebo when used as add-on to background treatment.
At week 24, mean improvements in peak and trough FEV1 were 0.185 litres (95% CI: 0.146 to 0.223 litres, p<0.0001) and 0.146 litres (0.105 to 0.188 litres, p<0.0001), respectively. The peak and trough FEV1 values for salmeterol were 0.196 litres (95% CI: 0.158 to 0.234 litres) and 0.114 litres (95% CI: 0.073 to 0.155 litres), respectively.
SPIRIVA RESPIMAT significantly improved morning and evening PEF (morning 24 L/min; 95% CI: 18 to 31 L/min, p< 0.0001; evening 23 L/min; 95% CI: 17 to 30 L/min, p<0.0001). The morning and evening PEF for salmeterol compared to placebo were 25 L/min (95% CI: 19 to 31 L/min) and 21 L/min (95% CI: 15 to 27 L/min), respectively.
Patients who took SPIRIVA RESPIMAT had a significantly higher ACQ responder rate at week 24 compared to patients taking placebo (Table 3). (See Table 3.)

Click on icon to see table/diagram/image

In the 12 week GraziaTinA-asthma study in patients who were symptomatic on maintenance treatment with low dose ICS, SPIRIVA RESPIMAT showed significant improvements in lung function over placebo when used as add-on to background treatment. At 12 weeks, the mean improvements in peak and trough FEV1 were 0.128 litres (95% CI: 0.057 to 0.199 litres, p<0.0005) and 0.122 litres (95% CI: 0.049 to 0.194 litres, p<0.0010), respectively.
Pharmacokinetics: Tiotropium bromide is a non-chiral quaternary ammonium compound and is sparingly soluble in water. Tiotropium bromide is available as inhalation solution administered by the Respimat inhaler. Approximately 40% of the inhaled dose is deposited in the lungs, the target organ, the remaining amount being deposited in the gastrointestinal tract. Some of the pharmacokinetic data described as follows were obtained with higher doses as recommended for therapy.
Absorption: Following inhalation by young healthy volunteers, urinary excretion data suggests that approximately 33% of the inhaled dose reaches the systemic circulation. Oral solutions of tiotropium have an absolute bioavailability of 2-3%. Food is not expected to influence the absorption of tiotropium for the same reason. Maximum tiotropium plasma concentrations were observed 5-7 minutes after inhalation. At steady state, peak tiotropium plasma concentrations of 10.5 pg/mL were achieved in COPD patients and decreased rapidly in a multi-compartmental manner. Steady state trough plasma concentrations were 1.60 pg/mL.
A steady-state tiotropium peak plasma concentration of 5.15 pg/mL was attained 5 minutes after the administration of the same dose to patients with asthma.
Distribution: The drug has a plasma protein binding of 72% and shows a volume of distribution of 32 L/kg.
Local concentrations in the lung are not known, but the mode of administration suggests substantially higher concentrations in the lung. Studies in rats have shown that tiotropium does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier to any relevant extent.
Biotransformation: The extent of biotransformation is small. This is evident from a urinary excretion of 74% of unchanged substance after an intravenous dose to young healthy volunteers. Tiotropium bromide, an ester, is nonenzymatically cleaved to the alcohol N-methylscopine and dithienylglycolic acid, both not binding to muscarinic receptors.
In-vitro experiments with human liver microsomes and human hepatocytes suggest that some further drug (<20% of dose after intravenous administration) is metabolised by cytochrome P450 dependent oxidation and subsequent glutathione conjugation to a variety of Phase II-metabolites. This enzymatic pathway can be inhibited by the CYP450 2D6 (and 3A4) inhibitors, quinidine, ketoconazole and gestodene. Thus CYP450 2D6 and 3A4 are involved in the metabolic pathway that is responsible for the elimination of a smaller part of the dose. Tiotropium bromide even in supra-therapeutic concentrations does not inhibit cytochrome P450 1A1, 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1 or 3A in human liver microsomes.
Elimination: The effective half-life of tiotropium ranges between 27 to 45 h following inhalation by COPD patients.
Total clearance was 880 mL/min after an intravenous dose in young healthy volunteers. Intravenously administered tiotropium bromide is mainly excreted unchanged in urine (74%). After inhalation of the inhalation solution by COPD patients urinary excretion is 18.6% (0.93 mcg) of the dose, the remainder being mainly non-absorbed drug in gut that is eliminated via the faeces.
The effective half-life was 34 hours in patients with asthma.
The renal clearance of tiotropium exceeds the creatinine clearance, indicating secretion into the urine. After chronic once daily inhalation, pharmacokinetic steady state was reached by day 7 with no accumulation thereafter.
In patients with asthma, 11.9% (0.595 µg) of the dose is excreted unchanged in the urine over 24 hours post dose at steady state.
Linearity/nonlinearity: Tiotropium demonstrates linear pharmacokinetics in the therapeutic range independent of the formulation.
Elderly Patients: As expected for all predominantly renally excreted drugs, advancing age was associated with a decrease of tiotropium renal clearance from 347 mL/min in COPD patients <65 years to 275 mL/min in COPD patients ≥65 years. This did not result in a corresponding increase in AUC0-6,ss or Cmax,ss values.
Exposure to tiotropium was not found to differ with age in patients with asthma.
Renally Impaired Patients: Following once daily inhaled administration of tiotropium to steady-state in COPD patients with mild renal impairment (CLCR 50-80 mL/min) resulted in slightly higher AUC0-6,ss (between 1.8 to 30% higher) and similar Cmax,ss compared to patients with normal renal function (CLcr > 80 mL/min). In COPD patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (CLCR <50 mL/min) the intravenous administration of tiotropium bromide resulted in doubling of the total exposure (82% higher AUC0-4h) and 52% higher Cmax) compared to COPD patients with normal renal function, which was confirmed by plasma concentrations after dry powder inhalation.
Hepatically Impaired Patients: Liver insufficiency is not expected to have any relevant influence on tiotropium pharmacokinetics. Tiotropium is predominantly cleared by renal elimination (74% in young healthy volunteers) and simple non-enzymatic ester cleavage to pharmacologically inactive products.
Register or sign in to continue
Asia's one-stop resource for medical news, clinical reference and education
Already a member? Sign in
Register or sign in to continue
Asia's one-stop resource for medical news, clinical reference and education
Already a member? Sign in